L
League 237 — 2025
Power leader: ZenitHottest: FC Rostov +29.7Power spread: 439.8
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
League Elo
1,514.2
Current average rating
Power spread
439.8
Top vs bottom
Strongest team
Zenit
Elo 1,746.2
Hottest team
FC Rostov
Δ5 +29.7
Goals / Match
0.00
League average
League Elo
1,514.2
Spread 439.8
Teams
103
League clubs
Matches
0
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 31 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 32 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 33 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 34 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 35 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 36 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 37 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 38 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 39 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 41 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 42 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 43 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 44 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 45 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 46 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 47 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 48 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 49 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 50 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 51 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 52 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 53 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 54 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 55 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 56 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 57 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 58 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 59 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 61 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 62 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 63 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 64 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 65 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 66 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 67 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 68 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 69 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 70 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 71 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 72 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 73 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 74 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 75 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 76 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 77 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 78 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 79 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 81 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 82 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 83 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 84 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 85 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 86 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 87 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 88 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 89 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 90 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 91 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 92 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 93 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 94 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 95 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 96 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 97 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 98 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 100 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 101 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 102 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 103 | 0 | 0 | – |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,746.2 | -1.2 | -98.0 | |
| 2 | 1,693.7 | +9.3 | -32.0 | |
| 3 | 1,650.7 | +21.6 | -79.0 | |
| 4 | 1,649.2 | -8.0 | -54.0 | |
| 5 | 1,639.8 | +2.5 | -1.0 | |
| 6 | 1,638.6 | -10.2 | -19.0 | |
| 7 | 1,630.4 | -5.3 | -41.0 | |
| 8 | 1,616.2 | +16.7 | -87.0 | |
| 9 | 1,612.4 | +1.5 | -3.0 | |
| 10 | 1,610.8 | -0.2 | -10.0 | |
| 11 | 1,601.2 | -0.9 | -64.0 | |
| 12 | 1,599.9 | 0.0 | -29.0 | |
| 13 | 1,596.2 | +16.3 | -34.0 | |
| 14 | 1,596.0 | -3.8 | -8.0 | |
| 15 | 1,593.5 | +16.5 | -39.0 | |
| 16 | 1,592.2 | +10.4 | -12.0 | |
| 17 | 1,591.6 | +11.8 | -53.0 | |
| 18 | 1,584.1 | -6.7 | -67.0 | |
| 19 | 1,583.1 | +8.7 | -27.0 | |
| 20 | 1,581.6 | +3.8 | -43.0 | |
| 21 | 1,580.1 | -0.3 | -81.0 | |
| 22 | 1,574.0 | -20.7 | -50.0 | |
| 23 | 1,571.3 | -1.2 | -58.0 | |
| 24 | 1,571.3 | +0.6 | -68.0 | |
| 25 | 1,567.3 | +19.5 | -5.0 | |
| 26 | 1,565.1 | -0.7 | -6.0 | |
| 27 | 1,564.3 | +11.8 | -4.0 | |
| 28 | 1,561.4 | -11.0 | -46.0 | |
| 29 | 1,556.2 | -8.8 | -42.0 | |
| 30 | 1,547.1 | -10.6 | -27.0 | |
| 31 | 1,545.6 | -16.5 | +5 table | |
| 32 | 1,541.1 | +8.0 | +8 table | |
| 33 | 1,541.1 | -18.5 | +31 table | |
| 34 | 1,540.2 | +21.2 | -54.0 | |
| 35 | 1,533.1 | +15.3 | -62.0 | |
| 36 | 1,527.5 | -17.9 | -62.0 | |
| 37 | 1,526.6 | +1.3 | +8 table | |
| 38 | 1,525.3 | +16.7 | +33 table | |
| 39 | 1,525.2 | +13.8 | -38.0 | |
| 40 | 1,524.4 | +1.3 | -53.0 | |
| 41 | 1,523.4 | -21.8 | -19.0 | |
| 42 | 1,523.2 | +4.4 | -54.0 | |
| 43 | 1,521.4 | +27.1 | Aligned | |
| 44 | 1,520.8 | -10.8 | -22.0 | |
| 45 | 1,519.9 | -2.0 | +22 table | |
| 46 | 1,515.0 | +12.0 | -45.0 | |
| 47 | 1,514.3 | +14.3 | +34 table | |
| 48 | 1,514.3 | -10.8 | -13.0 | |
| 49 | 1,514.1 | +8.9 | +32 table | |
| 50 | 1,513.9 | +10.4 | -19.0 | |
| 51 | 1,513.8 | -7.7 | +12 table | |
| 52 | 1,506.1 | 0.0 | -26.0 | |
| 53 | 1,502.5 | +2.2 | +49 table | |
| 54 | 1,502.5 | +2.6 | +2 table | |
| 55 | 1,501.7 | +1.8 | +22 table | |
| 56 | 1,501.4 | +14.8 | +40 table | |
| 57 | 1,500.5 | +0.5 | -44.0 | |
| 58 | 1,500.0 | -8.7 | -9.0 | |
| 59 | 1,498.7 | +29.4 | +50 table | |
| 60 | 1,497.7 | -14.6 | -19.0 | |
| 61 | 1,497.2 | -2.8 | +60 table | |
| 62 | 1,496.8 | -3.2 | +20 table | |
| 63 | 1,489.8 | -10.2 | -23.0 | |
| 64 | 1,489.4 | +10.6 | +5 table | |
| 65 | 1,488.2 | -13.1 | +20 table | |
| 66 | 1,486.7 | -9.9 | +39 table | |
| 67 | 1,485.0 | -15.0 | +16 table | |
| 68 | 1,482.9 | +7.5 | -35.0 | |
| 69 | 1,482.8 | -17.2 | -4.0 | |
| 70 | 1,482.1 | -17.9 | +62 table | |
| 71 | 1,481.8 | -18.2 | +57 table | |
| 72 | 1,481.0 | +3.3 | +62 table | |
| 73 | 1,479.5 | -11.8 | +38 table | |
| 74 | 1,479.0 | -8.3 | -15.0 | |
| 75 | 1,477.7 | +29.7 | +39 table | |
| 76 | 1,477.3 | -9.0 | Aligned | |
| 77 | 1,475.8 | +4.9 | +59 table | |
| 78 | 1,474.3 | +4.9 | +71 table | |
| 79 | 1,472.9 | -25.6 | +76 table | |
| 80 | 1,471.3 | +3.1 | -10.0 | |
| 81 | 1,467.6 | +3.9 | +43 table | |
| 82 | 1,465.0 | -9.0 | +63 table | |
| 83 | 1,462.0 | -7.6 | +62 table | |
| 84 | 1,456.9 | -0.3 | +31 table | |
| 85 | 1,455.2 | -10.7 | +17 table | |
| 86 | 1,453.8 | -24.0 | +49 table | |
| 87 | 1,445.4 | +0.7 | Aligned | |
| 88 | 1,444.0 | -1.2 | +38 table | |
| 89 | 1,443.3 | -11.1 | -5.0 | |
| 90 | 1,436.3 | 0.0 | +10 table | |
| 91 | 1,431.0 | +6.3 | +8 table | |
| 92 | 1,429.2 | -8.0 | +30 table | |
| 93 | 1,420.2 | -9.7 | +82 table | |
| 94 | 1,419.7 | -0.9 | +50 table | |
| 95 | 1,418.2 | -25.8 | +31 table | |
| 96 | 1,416.6 | -1.1 | -4.0 | |
| 97 | 1,413.4 | -10.7 | +41 table | |
| 98 | 1,410.1 | +7.2 | +83 table | |
| 99 | 1,403.5 | -10.4 | +50 table | |
| 100 | 1,382.4 | -8.3 | +35 table | |
| 101 | 1,379.2 | +8.1 | +61 table | |
| 102 | 1,353.2 | -8.8 | +18 table | |
| 103 | 1,306.4 | -6.2 | +48 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 31 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 32 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 33 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 34 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 35 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 36 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 37 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 38 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 39 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 41 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 42 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 43 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 44 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 45 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 46 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 47 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 48 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 49 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 50 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 51 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 52 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 53 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 54 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 55 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 56 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 57 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 58 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 59 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 61 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 62 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 63 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 64 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 65 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 66 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 67 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 68 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 69 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 70 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 71 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 72 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 73 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 74 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 75 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 76 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 77 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 78 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 79 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 80 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 81 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 82 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 83 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 84 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 85 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 86 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 87 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 88 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 89 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 90 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 91 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 92 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 93 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 94 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 95 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 96 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 97 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 98 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 99 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 100 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 101 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 102 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 103 | 0 | 0 | – |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,746.2 | -1.2 | -98.0 | |
| 2 | 1,693.7 | +9.3 | -32.0 | |
| 3 | 1,650.7 | +21.6 | -79.0 | |
| 4 | 1,649.2 | -8.0 | -54.0 | |
| 5 | 1,639.8 | +2.5 | -1.0 | |
| 6 | 1,638.6 | -10.2 | -19.0 | |
| 7 | 1,630.4 | -5.3 | -41.0 | |
| 8 | 1,616.2 | +16.7 | -87.0 | |
| 9 | 1,612.4 | +1.5 | -3.0 | |
| 10 | 1,610.8 | -0.2 | -10.0 | |
| 11 | 1,601.2 | -0.9 | -64.0 | |
| 12 | 1,599.9 | 0.0 | -29.0 | |
| 13 | 1,596.2 | +16.3 | -34.0 | |
| 14 | 1,596.0 | -3.8 | -8.0 | |
| 15 | 1,593.5 | +16.5 | -39.0 | |
| 16 | 1,592.2 | +10.4 | -12.0 | |
| 17 | 1,591.6 | +11.8 | -53.0 | |
| 18 | 1,584.1 | -6.7 | -67.0 | |
| 19 | 1,583.1 | +8.7 | -27.0 | |
| 20 | 1,581.6 | +3.8 | -43.0 | |
| 21 | 1,580.1 | -0.3 | -81.0 | |
| 22 | 1,574.0 | -20.7 | -50.0 | |
| 23 | 1,571.3 | -1.2 | -58.0 | |
| 24 | 1,571.3 | +0.6 | -68.0 | |
| 25 | 1,567.3 | +19.5 | -5.0 | |
| 26 | 1,565.1 | -0.7 | -6.0 | |
| 27 | 1,564.3 | +11.8 | -4.0 | |
| 28 | 1,561.4 | -11.0 | -46.0 | |
| 29 | 1,556.2 | -8.8 | -42.0 | |
| 30 | 1,547.1 | -10.6 | -27.0 | |
| 31 | 1,545.6 | -16.5 | +5 table | |
| 32 | 1,541.1 | +8.0 | +8 table | |
| 33 | 1,541.1 | -18.5 | +31 table | |
| 34 | 1,540.2 | +21.2 | -54.0 | |
| 35 | 1,533.1 | +15.3 | -62.0 | |
| 36 | 1,527.5 | -17.9 | -62.0 | |
| 37 | 1,526.6 | +1.3 | +8 table | |
| 38 | 1,525.3 | +16.7 | +33 table | |
| 39 | 1,525.2 | +13.8 | -38.0 | |
| 40 | 1,524.4 | +1.3 | -53.0 | |
| 41 | 1,523.4 | -21.8 | -19.0 | |
| 42 | 1,523.2 | +4.4 | -54.0 | |
| 43 | 1,521.4 | +27.1 | Aligned | |
| 44 | 1,520.8 | -10.8 | -22.0 | |
| 45 | 1,519.9 | -2.0 | +22 table | |
| 46 | 1,515.0 | +12.0 | -45.0 | |
| 47 | 1,514.3 | +14.3 | +34 table | |
| 48 | 1,514.3 | -10.8 | -13.0 | |
| 49 | 1,514.1 | +8.9 | +32 table | |
| 50 | 1,513.9 | +10.4 | -19.0 | |
| 51 | 1,513.8 | -7.7 | +12 table | |
| 52 | 1,506.1 | 0.0 | -26.0 | |
| 53 | 1,502.5 | +2.2 | +49 table | |
| 54 | 1,502.5 | +2.6 | +2 table | |
| 55 | 1,501.7 | +1.8 | +22 table | |
| 56 | 1,501.4 | +14.8 | +40 table | |
| 57 | 1,500.5 | +0.5 | -44.0 | |
| 58 | 1,500.0 | -8.7 | -9.0 | |
| 59 | 1,498.7 | +29.4 | +50 table | |
| 60 | 1,497.7 | -14.6 | -19.0 | |
| 61 | 1,497.2 | -2.8 | +60 table | |
| 62 | 1,496.8 | -3.2 | +20 table | |
| 63 | 1,489.8 | -10.2 | -23.0 | |
| 64 | 1,489.4 | +10.6 | +5 table | |
| 65 | 1,488.2 | -13.1 | +20 table | |
| 66 | 1,486.7 | -9.9 | +39 table | |
| 67 | 1,485.0 | -15.0 | +16 table | |
| 68 | 1,482.9 | +7.5 | -35.0 | |
| 69 | 1,482.8 | -17.2 | -4.0 | |
| 70 | 1,482.1 | -17.9 | +62 table | |
| 71 | 1,481.8 | -18.2 | +57 table | |
| 72 | 1,481.0 | +3.3 | +62 table | |
| 73 | 1,479.5 | -11.8 | +38 table | |
| 74 | 1,479.0 | -8.3 | -15.0 | |
| 75 | 1,477.7 | +29.7 | +39 table | |
| 76 | 1,477.3 | -9.0 | Aligned | |
| 77 | 1,475.8 | +4.9 | +59 table | |
| 78 | 1,474.3 | +4.9 | +71 table | |
| 79 | 1,472.9 | -25.6 | +76 table | |
| 80 | 1,471.3 | +3.1 | -10.0 | |
| 81 | 1,467.6 | +3.9 | +43 table | |
| 82 | 1,465.0 | -9.0 | +63 table | |
| 83 | 1,462.0 | -7.6 | +62 table | |
| 84 | 1,456.9 | -0.3 | +31 table | |
| 85 | 1,455.2 | -10.7 | +17 table | |
| 86 | 1,453.8 | -24.0 | +49 table | |
| 87 | 1,445.4 | +0.7 | Aligned | |
| 88 | 1,444.0 | -1.2 | +38 table | |
| 89 | 1,443.3 | -11.1 | -5.0 | |
| 90 | 1,436.3 | 0.0 | +10 table | |
| 91 | 1,431.0 | +6.3 | +8 table | |
| 92 | 1,429.2 | -8.0 | +30 table | |
| 93 | 1,420.2 | -9.7 | +82 table | |
| 94 | 1,419.7 | -0.9 | +50 table | |
| 95 | 1,418.2 | -25.8 | +31 table | |
| 96 | 1,416.6 | -1.1 | -4.0 | |
| 97 | 1,413.4 | -10.7 | +41 table | |
| 98 | 1,410.1 | +7.2 | +83 table | |
| 99 | 1,403.5 | -10.4 | +50 table | |
| 100 | 1,382.4 | -8.3 | +35 table | |
| 101 | 1,379.2 | +8.1 | +61 table | |
| 102 | 1,353.2 | -8.8 | +18 table | |
| 103 | 1,306.4 | -6.2 | +48 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
FC Rostov
Δ5 +29.7 · Table #36
Top faller
Nizhny Novgorod
Δ5 -25.8 · Table #64
Best attack
FC Krasnodar
Attack Elo 1,773.4
Best defense
Zenit
Defense Elo 1,748.0
Biggest overperformer
Chayka
Table #15 vs Power #98
Biggest underperformer
Zenit
Table #99 vs Power #1
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
No upcoming fixtures.
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
48
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
51
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Zenit
Table #99 vs Power #1
Value gaps
Overperformers
+83 vs power
+82 vs power
+76 vs power
+71 vs power
+63 vs power
Underperformers
+98 value
+32 value
+79 value
+54 value
+19 value
Best value: Zenit (#99 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Amkar (#6 table / #5 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
Top fallers
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
Safe zone
No live race cluster.
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
0.00
League scoring profile
Home wins
0.0%
Home edge at league level
Draws
0.0%
Share of level matches
Away wins
0.0%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- This looks like a lower-event league: goals per match sit below the usual high-scoring threshold.
- Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
- Draw frequency is relatively low, so decisive results shape the table faster.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
Best away teams
Best attacks
Best defenses
Goal Heatmap
Goal timing data is not available yet.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
3
23.7% · 36 matches
2
21.7% · 33 matches
4
15.1% · 23 matches
1
13.8% · 21 matches
0
11.2% · 17 matches
5
8.6% · 13 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 3 goals.
Half-time total goals
1
32.9% · 50 matches
0
32.2% · 49 matches
2
21.1% · 32 matches
3
11.2% · 17 matches
6
1.3% · 2 matches
4
1.3% · 2 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 1 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
1-1
11.8% · 18 matches
0-0
11.2% · 17 matches
1-0
8.6% · 13 matches
1-2
8.6% · 13 matches
2-1
7.9% · 12 matches
1-3
5.9% · 9 matches
2-0
5.3% · 8 matches
0-1
5.3% · 8 matches
Half-time scorelines
0-0
32.2% · 49 matches
1-0
22.4% · 34 matches
1-1
10.5% · 16 matches
0-1
10.5% · 16 matches
0-2
7.2% · 11 matches
1-2
3.9% · 6 matches
2-1
3.3% · 5 matches
2-0
3.3% · 5 matches
Match Stats — League 237 2025
Goals / match
0.00
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
1.40
Average home goals
Away goals / match
1.30
Average away goals
BTTS
52.6%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
53.3%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
29.6%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
38.2%
Result profile
Draws
27.0%
Result profile
Away wins
34.9%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
0.0%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
0.0%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.00
Scored or missed penalties
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
Zenit02026-04-08 19:450Spartak Moscow
Dynamo02026-04-08 17:150FC Krasnodar
Krylia Sovetov22026-04-07 17:005CSKA Moscow
Krylia Sovetov22026-03-19 16:302Lokomotiv
Spartak Moscow12026-03-18 18:450DynamoZenit12026-03-18 16:150Dinamo Makhachkala
FC Krasnodar42026-03-17 17:300CSKA MoscowDynamo52026-03-05 18:452Spartak Moscow
Arsenal Tula12026-03-05 16:302LokomotivCSKA Moscow32026-03-04 18:451FC KrasnodarMomentum leader
FC Rostov
Δ5 +29.7
Cooling team
Nizhny Novgorod
Δ5 -25.8
Risers & fallers
Top risers
Top fallers
League Storylines
Current power leader: Zenit (Elo 1,746.2). Momentum leader: FC Rostov with a last-five Elo change of +29.7. Most dangerous attack rating: FC Krasnodar (1,773.4). Most stable defensive rating: Zenit (1,748.0).
Matches 0Goals 0Average Elo 1,514.2
Top team
Zenit
Elo 1,746.2
Bottom team
Kvant
Elo 1,306.4
Average Elo
1,514.2
League baseline
Spread
439.8
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in League 237 2025?
Zenit currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,746.2. The average league Elo is 1,514.2.