State Cup — 2025
IsraelPower leader: Maccabi Kiryat GatHottest: Kafr Qasim +32.5
Next feature
—
Power spread
248.9
Teams
44
League clubs
Matches
15
Counted fixtures
Goals / Match
3.53
League average
Strongest Elo
Maccabi Kiryat Gat
Elo 1,641.3
Hottest Team
Kafr Qasim
Δ5 +32.5
League Elo
1,505.8
Spread 248.9
League Matches Summary
Matches counted: 15
League Goals & Averages
| Total Goals | 53 |
|---|---|
| Goals per Match | 3.53 |
Under / Over Goals — League Avg
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
League Key Tallies
| Clean Sheets (home) | 2 |
|---|---|
| Clean Sheets (away) | 6 |
FootyWow League Strength
Top team
Maccabi Kiryat Gat
Elo 1,641.3
Bottom team
Hapoel Tirat HaCarmel
Elo 1,392.4
Average Elo
1,505.8
League baseline
Spread
248.9
Top vs bottom
Elite · 2Strong · 9Stable · 10Fragile · 8Relegation risk · 15
FootyWow tiers are dynamic within each league context and reflect relative Elo strength rather than official competition positions.
Table — Stats Summary
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 3 | #55 · Relegation risk |
| 2 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | #33 · Fragile |
| 3 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | #49 · Relegation risk |
| 4 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 | #29 · Stable |
| 5 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | #12 · Strong |
| 6 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | #10 · Strong |
| 7 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | #20 · Stable |
| 8 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | #22 · Stable |
| 9 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | #25 · Stable |
| 10 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | #9 · Strong |
| 11 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | #23 · Stable |
| 12 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | #36 · Fragile |
| 13 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | #7 · Elite |
| 14 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | #4 · Elite |
| 15 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | #19 · Stable |
| 16 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #18 · Strong |
| 17 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #42 · Relegation risk |
| 18 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #57 · Relegation risk |
| 19 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #60 · Relegation risk |
| 20 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #59 · Relegation risk |
| 21 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #47 · Relegation risk |
| 22 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #14 · Strong |
| 23 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #28 · Stable |
| 24 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #27 · Stable |
| 25 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #48 · Relegation risk |
| 26 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #39 · Fragile |
| 27 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #15 · Strong |
| 28 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #13 · Strong |
| 29 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | #8 · Strong |
| 30 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | #41 · Relegation risk |
| 31 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | #54 · Relegation risk |
| 32 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | #32 · Fragile |
| 33 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | #30 · Stable |
| 34 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | #35 · Fragile |
| 35 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | #61 · Relegation risk |
| 36 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | #34 · Fragile |
| 37 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | #38 · Fragile |
| 38 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | #40 · Fragile |
| 39 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | #16 · Strong |
| 40 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | #51 · Relegation risk |
| 41 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 | #24 · Stable |
| 42 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | #45 · Relegation risk |
| 43 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | #44 · Relegation risk |
| 44 | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | #43 · Relegation risk |
This table shows what has already happened. Use FootyWow Power Rankings below to compare it with current Elo-based team strength.
FootyWow Power Rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Form | Home | Away | Attack | Defense | Table |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Elite | 1,641.3 | +25.3 | 1,674.2 | 1,545.0 | 1,562.7 | 1,645.4 | 1,575.0 | #14 |
| 7 | Elite | 1,580.0 | -0.3 | 1,568.5 | 1,518.7 | 1,545.8 | 1,586.0 | 1,491.5 | #13 |
| 8 | Strong | 1,576.5 | -10.0 | 1,531.5 | 1,529.3 | 1,533.3 | 1,650.1 | 1,556.6 | #29 |
| 9 | Strong | 1,569.6 | +20.3 | 1,592.3 | 1,522.0 | 1,528.6 | 1,552.7 | 1,567.3 | #10 |
| 10 | Strong | 1,560.4 | +8.3 | 1,562.4 | 1,530.1 | 1,517.4 | 1,494.7 | 1,570.7 | #6 |
| 12 | Strong | 1,547.5 | +13.0 | 1,556.2 | 1,509.1 | 1,529.8 | 1,544.5 | 1,564.7 | #5 |
| 13 | Strong | 1,540.1 | +20.1 | 1,586.0 | 1,515.1 | 1,525.3 | 1,540.6 | 1,513.2 | #28 |
| 14 | Strong | 1,537.9 | -2.4 | 1,522.2 | 1,494.5 | 1,534.1 | 1,617.0 | 1,510.1 | #22 |
| 15 | Strong | 1,535.2 | -12.9 | 1,477.1 | 1,511.5 | 1,531.2 | 1,561.8 | 1,532.5 | #27 |
| 16 | Strong | 1,532.7 | -10.6 | 1,485.0 | 1,512.9 | 1,509.6 | 1,570.2 | 1,547.3 | #39 |
| 18 | Strong | 1,527.4 | -9.1 | 1,486.4 | 1,509.8 | 1,503.7 | 1,589.8 | 1,486.8 | #16 |
| 19 | Stable | 1,526.5 | -5.4 | 1,503.7 | 1,508.1 | 1,518.9 | 1,520.4 | 1,499.7 | #15 |
| 20 | Stable | 1,519.1 | +9.0 | 1,525.0 | 1,497.4 | 1,520.4 | 1,491.3 | 1,523.8 | #7 |
| 22 | Stable | 1,516.4 | +1.5 | 1,508.9 | 1,482.4 | 1,528.7 | 1,486.5 | 1,507.1 | #8 |
| 23 | Stable | 1,514.2 | +14.2 | 1,530.0 | 1,506.3 | 1,501.4 | 1,525.1 | 1,489.2 | #11 |
| 24 | Stable | 1,512.4 | -12.9 | 1,454.3 | 1,506.1 | 1,498.7 | 1,532.1 | 1,527.4 | #41 |
| 25 | Stable | 1,507.0 | +6.9 | 1,505.3 | 1,495.0 | 1,509.6 | 1,500.8 | 1,459.7 | #9 |
| 27 | Stable | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | 1,500.0 | 1,500.0 | 1,500.0 | 1,500.0 | 1,500.0 | #24 |
| 28 | Stable | 1,499.0 | -9.3 | 1,457.2 | 1,503.7 | 1,502.4 | 1,514.5 | 1,527.3 | #23 |
| 29 | Stable | 1,498.6 | -1.4 | 1,485.2 | 1,501.1 | 1,500.0 | 1,527.1 | 1,501.8 | #4 |
| 30 | Stable | 1,498.3 | -1.7 | 1,490.6 | 1,499.3 | 1,500.0 | 1,496.0 | 1,501.6 | #33 |
| 32 | Fragile | 1,491.0 | -9.0 | 1,450.5 | 1,500.0 | 1,494.1 | 1,498.6 | 1,495.9 | #32 |
| 33 | Fragile | 1,488.6 | +15.6 | 1,501.5 | 1,488.7 | 1,500.3 | 1,594.3 | 1,460.9 | #2 |
| 34 | Fragile | 1,488.0 | -12.0 | 1,434.0 | 1,492.5 | 1,500.0 | 1,488.2 | 1,501.9 | #36 |
| 35 | Fragile | 1,487.4 | -12.6 | 1,430.7 | 1,492.3 | 1,500.0 | 1,496.0 | 1,493.6 | #34 |
| 36 | Fragile | 1,486.1 | -13.9 | 1,448.3 | 1,490.1 | 1,500.7 | 1,482.7 | 1,474.0 | #12 |
| 38 | Fragile | 1,486.0 | -14.0 | 1,423.0 | 1,491.5 | 1,500.0 | 1,496.4 | 1,483.7 | #37 |
| 39 | Fragile | 1,485.9 | +32.5 | 1,532.9 | 1,492.7 | 1,511.3 | 1,431.5 | 1,558.2 | #26 |
| 40 | Fragile | 1,484.7 | -15.3 | 1,415.8 | 1,491.6 | 1,500.0 | 1,485.8 | 1,492.1 | #38 |
| 41 | Relegation risk | 1,484.1 | -15.9 | 1,412.5 | 1,490.4 | 1,500.0 | 1,495.0 | 1,472.0 | #30 |
| 42 | Relegation risk | 1,482.6 | -9.2 | 1,441.2 | 1,518.3 | 1,478.4 | 1,452.8 | 1,519.6 | #17 |
| 43 | Relegation risk | 1,482.1 | -17.9 | 1,401.6 | 1,500.0 | 1,490.5 | 1,484.2 | 1,431.3 | #44 |
| 44 | Relegation risk | 1,480.3 | -19.7 | 1,391.7 | 1,488.0 | 1,500.0 | 1,481.5 | 1,455.0 | #43 |
| 45 | Relegation risk | 1,478.8 | -21.2 | 1,383.4 | 1,487.6 | 1,500.0 | 1,481.9 | 1,453.4 | #42 |
| 47 | Relegation risk | 1,473.9 | +5.5 | 1,473.2 | 1,453.1 | 1,533.7 | 1,417.6 | 1,531.9 | #21 |
| 48 | Relegation risk | 1,473.7 | -12.9 | 1,415.7 | 1,502.8 | 1,491.3 | 1,447.2 | 1,527.8 | #25 |
| 49 | Relegation risk | 1,473.5 | +8.6 | 1,480.2 | 1,497.0 | 1,481.7 | 1,582.7 | 1,456.2 | #3 |
| 51 | Relegation risk | 1,470.4 | -17.4 | 1,392.1 | 1,490.0 | 1,492.0 | 1,463.5 | 1,496.6 | #40 |
| 54 | Relegation risk | 1,446.3 | -9.3 | 1,404.4 | 1,491.7 | 1,471.5 | 1,506.4 | 1,456.5 | #31 |
| 55 | Relegation risk | 1,443.5 | +21.4 | 1,465.9 | 1,492.2 | 1,456.7 | 1,492.8 | 1,422.5 | #1 |
| 57 | Relegation risk | 1,440.3 | -8.8 | 1,400.7 | 1,457.7 | 1,477.7 | 1,412.1 | 1,444.8 | #18 |
| 59 | Relegation risk | 1,416.4 | -5.8 | 1,390.3 | 1,457.1 | 1,451.3 | 1,390.9 | 1,459.9 | #20 |
| 60 | Relegation risk | 1,393.3 | -11.0 | 1,343.8 | 1,425.2 | 1,483.2 | 1,448.1 | 1,390.9 | #19 |
| 61 | Relegation risk | 1,392.4 | -11.6 | 1,340.2 | 1,430.0 | 1,496.4 | 1,418.3 | 1,423.3 | #35 |
FootyWow Power Rankings are updated in the background from finished fixtures and reflect current strength, not just accumulated points.
Table vs Power
Overperformers
+54 vs power
+46 vs power
+41 vs power
+39 vs power
+39 vs power
Underperformers
+10 value
+6 value
+21 value
+15 value
+8 value
Best value: Maccabi Kiryat Gat (#14 table / #4 Elo)Most fragile top team: Dimona (#6 table / #10 Elo)
Elo Risers & Fallers
Top risers
+32.5
+25.3
+21.4
+20.3
+20.1
Top fallers
-21.2
-19.7
-17.9
-17.4
Upcoming Fixtures — Elo Edge
No upcoming fixtures.
Recent Fixtures
Maccabi Tel Aviv32026-04-15 18:452Maccabi Haifa
Hapoel Beer Sheva32026-04-09 18:302Bnei Yehuda
Maccabi Bnei Raina02026-02-04 19:003Hapoel Beer Sheva
Beitar Jerusalem12026-02-04 18:002Bnei Yehuda
Kafr Qasim12026-01-15 18:300Hapoel Kfar Saba
Hapoel Tel Aviv12026-01-14 19:301Maccabi Tel Aviv
Hapoel Ra'anana02026-01-14 19:001Maccabi Haifa
Ironi Kiryat Shmona02026-01-14 18:002Beitar JerusalemPower by Split
Best home teams
1,545.0
1,530.1
1,529.3
1,522.0
1,518.7
Best away teams
1,562.7
1,545.8
1,534.1
1,533.7
1,533.3
Best attacks
1,650.1
1,645.4
1,617.0
1,594.3
1,589.8
Best defenses
1,575.0
1,570.7
1,567.3
1,564.7
1,558.2
League Storylines
Current power leader: Maccabi Kiryat Gat (Elo 1,641.3). Momentum leader: Kafr Qasim with a last-five Elo change of +32.5. Most dangerous attack rating: Maccabi Petah Tikva (1,650.1). Most stable defensive rating: Maccabi Kiryat Gat (1,575.0).
Matches 15Goals 53Average Elo 1,505.8
Top team
Maccabi Kiryat Gat
Elo 1,641.3
Bottom team
Hapoel Tirat HaCarmel
Elo 1,392.4
Average Elo
1,505.8
League baseline
Spread
248.9
Top vs bottom
Race Tracker
Title race
Upper-table race
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
0 pts
0 pts
0 pts
Relegation fight
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
About FootyWow Power Rankings
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in State Cup 2025?
Maccabi Kiryat Gat currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,641.3. The average league Elo is 1,505.8.
Does this page calculate Elo live?
No. League and team Elo values are generated in the background from local cache fixtures and then served from JSON, so this page stays fast.
vtt 34 , vtd1