Cup — 2025
LithuaniaPower leader: Kauno ŽalgirisHottest: Panevėžys +75.5Power spread: 325.2
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
League Elo
1,508.0
Current average rating
Power spread
325.2
Top vs bottom
Strongest team
Kauno Žalgiris
Elo 1,701.8
Hottest team
Panevėžys
Δ5 +75.5
Goals / Match
4.33
League average
League Elo
1,508.0
Spread 325.2
Teams
50
League clubs
Matches
49
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 22 | W W W W W | |
| 2 | 12 | 9 | W W W W L | |
| 3 | 9 | 10 | W W W L | |
| 4 | 9 | 6 | W W W L | |
| 5 | 9 | 2 | W W W L | |
| 6 | 9 | 2 | W W W L | |
| 7 | 6 | 15 | W W L | |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | W W L | |
| 9 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 10 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 11 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 12 | 6 | -1 | W W L | |
| 13 | 3 | 16 | W L | |
| 14 | 3 | 6 | W L | |
| 15 | 3 | 4 | W L | |
| 16 | 3 | 4 | W L | |
| 17 | 3 | 3 | W L | |
| 18 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 19 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 22 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 23 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 24 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 25 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 26 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 27 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 28 | 3 | -3 | W L | |
| 29 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 30 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 31 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 32 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 33 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 34 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 35 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 36 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 37 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 38 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 39 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 40 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 41 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 42 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 43 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 44 | 0 | -5 | L | |
| 45 | 0 | -6 | L | |
| 46 | 0 | -6 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -8 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -13 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -13 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -17 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,701.8 | +7.4 | -8.0 | |
| 2 | 1,648.9 | +3.6 | -14.0 | |
| 3 | 1,630.5 | +32.9 | Aligned | |
| 4 | 1,608.6 | +0.7 | -3.0 | |
| 5 | 1,586.5 | +36.5 | +3 table | |
| 6 | 1,577.3 | +34.1 | +2 table | |
| 7 | 1,576.8 | +3.3 | -8.0 | |
| 8 | 1,573.4 | +75.5 | +7 table | |
| 9 | 1,569.0 | +4.7 | -5.0 | |
| 10 | 1,556.4 | -0.3 | -12.0 | |
| 11 | 1,552.6 | +29.3 | +5 table | |
| 12 | 1,545.3 | 0.0 | -21.0 | |
| 13 | 1,517.2 | +17.3 | +5 table | |
| 14 | 1,512.0 | +28.0 | +9 table | |
| 15 | 1,510.3 | -5.5 | -12.0 | |
| 16 | 1,509.3 | 0.0 | -16.0 | |
| 17 | 1,509.2 | +3.0 | -6.0 | |
| 18 | 1,505.4 | +5.3 | +8 table | |
| 19 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -20.0 | |
| 20 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -23.0 | |
| 21 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -27.0 | |
| 22 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -9.0 | |
| 23 | 1,499.6 | +13.4 | +12 table | |
| 24 | 1,498.2 | -1.8 | +12 table | |
| 25 | 1,497.1 | -3.0 | +4 table | |
| 26 | 1,496.6 | -16.9 | -12.0 | |
| 27 | 1,493.1 | +2.4 | +7 table | |
| 28 | 1,489.6 | -10.4 | -7.0 | |
| 29 | 1,487.9 | -12.1 | +12 table | |
| 30 | 1,487.3 | 0.0 | -14.0 | |
| 31 | 1,487.1 | -12.9 | -3.0 | |
| 32 | 1,486.5 | 0.0 | -4.0 | |
| 33 | 1,486.4 | -13.6 | +3 table | |
| 34 | 1,485.7 | -14.3 | -3.0 | |
| 35 | 1,484.8 | -15.2 | +10 table | |
| 36 | 1,484.4 | -15.6 | +10 table | |
| 37 | 1,484.1 | -15.9 | -4.0 | |
| 38 | 1,483.9 | -16.1 | -2.0 | |
| 39 | 1,483.1 | -16.9 | +11 table | |
| 40 | 1,482.5 | -17.5 | -2.0 | |
| 41 | 1,481.9 | +3.4 | +23 table | |
| 42 | 1,481.2 | -18.8 | -5.0 | |
| 43 | 1,480.9 | -19.1 | -3.0 | |
| 44 | 1,480.8 | -19.2 | -5.0 | |
| 45 | 1,478.7 | -21.3 | -5.0 | |
| 46 | 1,461.0 | -7.3 | +27 table | |
| 47 | 1,397.0 | -13.1 | +23 table | |
| 48 | 1,391.4 | -11.0 | +19 table | |
| 49 | 1,381.7 | +12.1 | +36 table | |
| 50 | 1,376.6 | -15.1 | +5 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 22 | W W W W W | |
| 2 | 12 | 9 | W W W W L | |
| 3 | 9 | 10 | W W W L | |
| 4 | 9 | 6 | W W W L | |
| 5 | 9 | 2 | W W W L | |
| 6 | 9 | 2 | W W W L | |
| 7 | 6 | 15 | W W L | |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | W W L | |
| 9 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 10 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 11 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 12 | 6 | -1 | W W L | |
| 13 | 3 | 16 | W L | |
| 14 | 3 | 6 | W L | |
| 15 | 3 | 4 | W L | |
| 16 | 3 | 4 | W L | |
| 17 | 3 | 3 | W L | |
| 18 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 19 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 22 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 23 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 24 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 25 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 26 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 27 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 28 | 3 | -3 | W L | |
| 29 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 30 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 31 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 32 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 33 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 34 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 35 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 36 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 37 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 38 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 39 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 40 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 41 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 42 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 43 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 44 | 0 | -5 | L | |
| 45 | 0 | -6 | L | |
| 46 | 0 | -6 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -8 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -13 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -13 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -17 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,701.8 | +7.4 | -8.0 | |
| 2 | 1,648.9 | +3.6 | -14.0 | |
| 3 | 1,630.5 | +32.9 | Aligned | |
| 4 | 1,608.6 | +0.7 | -3.0 | |
| 5 | 1,586.5 | +36.5 | +3 table | |
| 6 | 1,577.3 | +34.1 | +2 table | |
| 7 | 1,576.8 | +3.3 | -8.0 | |
| 8 | 1,573.4 | +75.5 | +7 table | |
| 9 | 1,569.0 | +4.7 | -5.0 | |
| 10 | 1,556.4 | -0.3 | -12.0 | |
| 11 | 1,552.6 | +29.3 | +5 table | |
| 12 | 1,545.3 | 0.0 | -21.0 | |
| 13 | 1,517.2 | +17.3 | +5 table | |
| 14 | 1,512.0 | +28.0 | +9 table | |
| 15 | 1,510.3 | -5.5 | -12.0 | |
| 16 | 1,509.3 | 0.0 | -16.0 | |
| 17 | 1,509.2 | +3.0 | -6.0 | |
| 18 | 1,505.4 | +5.3 | +8 table | |
| 19 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -20.0 | |
| 20 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -23.0 | |
| 21 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -27.0 | |
| 22 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -9.0 | |
| 23 | 1,499.6 | +13.4 | +12 table | |
| 24 | 1,498.2 | -1.8 | +12 table | |
| 25 | 1,497.1 | -3.0 | +4 table | |
| 26 | 1,496.6 | -16.9 | -12.0 | |
| 27 | 1,493.1 | +2.4 | +7 table | |
| 28 | 1,489.6 | -10.4 | -7.0 | |
| 29 | 1,487.9 | -12.1 | +12 table | |
| 30 | 1,487.3 | 0.0 | -14.0 | |
| 31 | 1,487.1 | -12.9 | -3.0 | |
| 32 | 1,486.5 | 0.0 | -4.0 | |
| 33 | 1,486.4 | -13.6 | +3 table | |
| 34 | 1,485.7 | -14.3 | -3.0 | |
| 35 | 1,484.8 | -15.2 | +10 table | |
| 36 | 1,484.4 | -15.6 | +10 table | |
| 37 | 1,484.1 | -15.9 | -4.0 | |
| 38 | 1,483.9 | -16.1 | -2.0 | |
| 39 | 1,483.1 | -16.9 | +11 table | |
| 40 | 1,482.5 | -17.5 | -2.0 | |
| 41 | 1,481.9 | +3.4 | +23 table | |
| 42 | 1,481.2 | -18.8 | -5.0 | |
| 43 | 1,480.9 | -19.1 | -3.0 | |
| 44 | 1,480.8 | -19.2 | -5.0 | |
| 45 | 1,478.7 | -21.3 | -5.0 | |
| 46 | 1,461.0 | -7.3 | +27 table | |
| 47 | 1,397.0 | -13.1 | +23 table | |
| 48 | 1,391.4 | -11.0 | +19 table | |
| 49 | 1,381.7 | +12.1 | +36 table | |
| 50 | 1,376.6 | -15.1 | +5 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
Panevėžys
Δ5 +75.5 · Table #1
Top faller
Ave.Ko
Δ5 -21.3 · Table #50
Best attack
TransINVEST Vilnius
Attack Elo 1,926.4
Best defense
Kauno Žalgiris
Defense Elo 1,740.1
Biggest overperformer
Ekranas
Table #13 vs Power #49
Biggest underperformer
Sendvaris
Table #48 vs Power #21
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
No upcoming fixtures.
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
22
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
27
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Ekranas
Table #13 vs Power #49
Value gaps
Overperformers
Underperformers
+8 value
+14 value
+3 value
+8 value
+5 value
Best value: Kauno Žalgiris (#9 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Babrungas (#3 table / #3 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
Top fallers
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
9 pts
9 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Relegation
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Safe zone
No live race cluster.
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
4.33
League scoring profile
Home wins
22.4%
Home edge at league level
Draws
0.0%
Share of level matches
Away wins
77.6%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- This looks like a high-event league: goals per match are comfortably above the typical 2.5 line.
- Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
- Draw frequency is relatively low, so decisive results shape the table faster.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
1,575.7
1,572.2
1,560.9
1,548.2
1,545.4
Best away teams
Best attacks
Best defenses
Goal Heatmap
0-15
9
8.3% of league goals
16-30
19
17.6% of league goals
31-45
11
10.2% of league goals
46-60
20
18.5% of league goals
61-75
18
16.7% of league goals
76-90
31
28.7% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
1
19.5% · 8 matches
3
17.1% · 7 matches
6
17.1% · 7 matches
4
14.6% · 6 matches
2
12.2% · 5 matches
5
12.2% · 5 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 1 goals.
Half-time total goals
0
29.3% · 12 matches
1
29.3% · 12 matches
2
29.3% · 12 matches
3
7.3% · 3 matches
6
2.4% · 1 matches
8
2.4% · 1 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 0 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
0-2
12.2% · 5 matches
0-1
12.2% · 5 matches
0-3
9.8% · 4 matches
0-6
9.8% · 4 matches
1-0
7.3% · 3 matches
1-2
7.3% · 3 matches
1-3
7.3% · 3 matches
1-4
4.9% · 2 matches
Half-time scorelines
0-0
29.3% · 12 matches
0-2
24.4% · 10 matches
0-1
22.0% · 9 matches
1-0
7.3% · 3 matches
0-3
4.9% · 2 matches
1-1
4.9% · 2 matches
0-6
2.4% · 1 matches
1-7
2.4% · 1 matches
Match Stats — Cup 2025
Goals / match
4.33
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
0.63
Average home goals
Away goals / match
3.51
Average away goals
BTTS
39.0%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
68.3%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
51.2%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
12.2%
Result profile
Draws
0.0%
Result profile
Away wins
87.8%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
12.2%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
58.5%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.27
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
1.93
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.24
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
Panevėžys12025-09-28 15:000Hegelmann Litauen
Džiugas Telšiai12025-09-17 17:302Hegelmann Litauen
Suduva Marijampole02025-09-16 17:302Panevėžys
Jonava12025-08-13 18:004Panevėžys
Babrungas12025-08-12 17:002Džiugas Telšiai
Kauno Žalgiris02025-08-10 18:002Suduva MarijampoleHegelmann Litauen32025-08-07 18:301Šiauliai
Tauras12025-05-28 17:003Suduva Marijampole
Garliava02025-05-27 18:303Panevėžys
TransINVEST Vilnius02025-05-27 18:001Hegelmann LitauenMomentum leader
Panevėžys
Δ5 +75.5
Cooling team
Ave.Ko
Δ5 -21.3
Risers & fallers
Top risers
Top fallers
League Storylines
Current power leader: Kauno Žalgiris (Elo 1,701.8). Momentum leader: Panevėžys with a last-five Elo change of +75.5. Most dangerous attack rating: TransINVEST Vilnius (1,926.4). Most stable defensive rating: Kauno Žalgiris (1,740.1).
Matches 49Goals 212Average Elo 1,508.0
Top team
Kauno Žalgiris
Elo 1,701.8
Bottom team
Dainava
Elo 1,376.6
Average Elo
1,508.0
League baseline
Spread
325.2
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in Cup 2025?
Kauno Žalgiris currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,701.8. The average league Elo is 1,508.0.