EFL Trophy — 2025
EnglandPower leader: LincolnHottest: AFC Wimbledon +48.2Power spread: 277.5
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
League Elo
1,513.2
Current average rating
Power spread
277.5
Top vs bottom
Strongest team
Lincoln
Elo 1,678.0
Hottest team
AFC Wimbledon
Δ5 +48.2
Goals / Match
3.85
League average
League Elo
1,513.2
Spread 277.5
Teams
64
League clubs
Matches
127
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 12 | W W W W L | |
| 2 | 18 | 10 | W L W W W | |
| 3 | 18 | 9 | W W W W L | |
| 4 | 18 | 6 | W W W W L | |
| 5 | 12 | 10 | W W W W L | |
| 6 | 12 | 9 | L W W W L | |
| 7 | 12 | 7 | W W W W L | |
| 8 | 12 | 6 | W L W W L | |
| 9 | 12 | 6 | W L W W L | |
| 10 | 12 | 6 | W L W W W | |
| 11 | 12 | 5 | W W W W L | |
| 12 | 12 | 4 | W W W W L | |
| 13 | 12 | 3 | W W W W L | |
| 14 | 9 | 9 | W W W L | |
| 15 | 9 | 7 | W W W L | |
| 16 | 9 | 6 | W W W L | |
| 17 | 9 | 4 | L W W W L | |
| 18 | 9 | 3 | W W W L | |
| 19 | 9 | 3 | W W W L | |
| 20 | 9 | 2 | W L W W L | |
| 21 | 9 | 1 | W W W L | |
| 22 | 9 | 1 | W L W W L | |
| 23 | 9 | 0 | W W W L | |
| 24 | 6 | 3 | W W L L | |
| 25 | 6 | 2 | L W W L | |
| 26 | 6 | 2 | L W W | |
| 27 | 6 | 1 | W L W L | |
| 28 | 6 | 0 | W W L L | |
| 29 | 6 | 0 | L W W L | |
| 30 | 6 | -1 | L W W | |
| 31 | 6 | -2 | W L W L | |
| 32 | 6 | -3 | L W W L | |
| 33 | 3 | 0 | W L L | |
| 34 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 35 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 36 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 37 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 38 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 39 | 3 | -1 | L W L | |
| 40 | 3 | -2 | W L L | |
| 41 | 3 | -2 | L L W | |
| 42 | 3 | -2 | L L W | |
| 43 | 3 | -2 | L L W | |
| 44 | 3 | -3 | L W L | |
| 45 | 3 | -3 | L L W | |
| 46 | 3 | -4 | L L W | |
| 47 | 3 | -4 | L L W | |
| 48 | 3 | -4 | L W L | |
| 49 | 3 | -5 | L W L L | |
| 50 | 3 | -5 | L W L | |
| 51 | 3 | -10 | L W L L | |
| 52 | 0 | -4 | L L L | |
| 53 | 0 | -4 | L L L | |
| 54 | 0 | -4 | L L L | |
| 55 | 0 | -4 | L L L | |
| 56 | 0 | -5 | L L L | |
| 57 | 0 | -6 | L L L | |
| 58 | 0 | -6 | L L L | |
| 59 | 0 | -6 | L L L | |
| 60 | 0 | -7 | L L L | |
| 61 | 0 | -7 | L L L | |
| 62 | 0 | -8 | L L L | |
| 63 | 0 | -9 | L L L | |
| 64 | 0 | -9 | L L L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,678.0 | +18.7 | -15.0 | |
| 2 | 1,613.1 | +45.4 | Aligned | |
| 3 | 1,608.8 | -9.4 | -27.0 | |
| 4 | 1,605.7 | -14.8 | -27.0 | |
| 5 | 1,598.3 | +32.6 | Aligned | |
| 6 | 1,597.2 | +10.4 | +2 table | |
| 7 | 1,595.6 | +8.1 | -20.0 | |
| 8 | 1,586.8 | +10.3 | -2.0 | |
| 9 | 1,585.9 | -18.5 | -44.0 | |
| 10 | 1,578.6 | +0.5 | -24.0 | |
| 11 | 1,577.4 | -19.3 | -40.0 | |
| 12 | 1,574.1 | -24.8 | -23.0 | |
| 13 | 1,569.5 | +11.5 | -7.0 | |
| 14 | 1,559.3 | -32.3 | -50.0 | |
| 15 | 1,557.2 | -8.7 | -13.0 | |
| 16 | 1,554.1 | -14.1 | -30.0 | |
| 17 | 1,552.6 | +11.0 | -4.0 | |
| 18 | 1,551.2 | -15.0 | -23.0 | |
| 19 | 1,549.9 | +4.3 | -6.0 | |
| 20 | 1,549.8 | +14.8 | -6.0 | |
| 21 | 1,545.9 | +23.8 | +6 table | |
| 22 | 1,540.3 | +6.7 | +13 table | |
| 23 | 1,533.2 | -23.1 | -32.0 | |
| 24 | 1,529.2 | -40.6 | -39.0 | |
| 25 | 1,528.7 | -14.1 | -34.0 | |
| 26 | 1,524.5 | +19.4 | +8 table | |
| 27 | 1,522.1 | +29.0 | +26 table | |
| 28 | 1,519.9 | +27.0 | +21 table | |
| 29 | 1,519.9 | -21.5 | -29.0 | |
| 30 | 1,519.0 | -35.1 | -31.0 | |
| 31 | 1,518.9 | +36.4 | +17 table | |
| 32 | 1,516.5 | +32.7 | +26 table | |
| 33 | 1,516.0 | -12.8 | -15.0 | |
| 34 | 1,515.7 | -26.9 | -18.0 | |
| 35 | 1,514.4 | +8.6 | +16 table | |
| 36 | 1,513.7 | -0.2 | +12 table | |
| 37 | 1,512.5 | -21.6 | -3.0 | |
| 38 | 1,504.5 | -13.9 | Aligned | |
| 39 | 1,503.4 | +0.5 | -18.0 | |
| 40 | 1,502.0 | +23.4 | +32 table | |
| 41 | 1,497.2 | -20.5 | -2.0 | |
| 42 | 1,495.9 | -8.1 | +20 table | |
| 43 | 1,494.5 | +4.8 | +14 table | |
| 44 | 1,481.1 | -0.1 | +12 table | |
| 45 | 1,480.6 | -11.1 | -9.0 | |
| 46 | 1,475.7 | +23.6 | +33 table | |
| 47 | 1,472.2 | -25.1 | -2.0 | |
| 48 | 1,472.0 | -25.5 | -2.0 | |
| 49 | 1,468.7 | -14.3 | +4 table | |
| 50 | 1,462.4 | +4.0 | +8 table | |
| 51 | 1,459.1 | -26.3 | -5.0 | |
| 52 | 1,454.7 | -20.4 | -8.0 | |
| 53 | 1,446.2 | +48.2 | +41 table | |
| 54 | 1,444.9 | -13.8 | +18 table | |
| 55 | 1,431.1 | -37.9 | -7.0 | |
| 56 | 1,430.2 | +37.8 | +53 table | |
| 57 | 1,426.8 | -0.1 | +13 table | |
| 58 | 1,426.7 | -17.1 | +11 table | |
| 59 | 1,425.9 | +6.2 | +20 table | |
| 60 | 1,424.5 | +8.5 | +37 table | |
| 61 | 1,415.4 | +47.5 | +50 table | |
| 62 | 1,412.4 | +40.8 | +45 table | |
| 63 | 1,401.9 | -0.9 | +26 table | |
| 64 | 1,400.5 | -9.3 | +31 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 12 | W W W W L | |
| 2 | 18 | 10 | W L W W W | |
| 3 | 18 | 9 | W W W W L | |
| 4 | 18 | 6 | W W W W L | |
| 5 | 12 | 10 | W W W W L | |
| 6 | 12 | 9 | L W W W L | |
| 7 | 12 | 7 | W W W W L | |
| 8 | 12 | 6 | W L W W L | |
| 9 | 12 | 6 | W L W W L | |
| 10 | 12 | 6 | W L W W W | |
| 11 | 12 | 5 | W W W W L | |
| 12 | 12 | 4 | W W W W L | |
| 13 | 12 | 3 | W W W W L | |
| 14 | 9 | 9 | W W W L | |
| 15 | 9 | 7 | W W W L | |
| 16 | 9 | 6 | W W W L | |
| 17 | 9 | 4 | L W W W L | |
| 18 | 9 | 3 | W W W L | |
| 19 | 9 | 3 | W W W L | |
| 20 | 9 | 2 | W L W W L | |
| 21 | 9 | 1 | W W W L | |
| 22 | 9 | 1 | W L W W L | |
| 23 | 9 | 0 | W W W L | |
| 24 | 6 | 3 | W W L L | |
| 25 | 6 | 2 | L W W L | |
| 26 | 6 | 2 | L W W | |
| 27 | 6 | 1 | W L W L | |
| 28 | 6 | 0 | W W L L | |
| 29 | 6 | 0 | L W W L | |
| 30 | 6 | -1 | L W W | |
| 31 | 6 | -2 | W L W L | |
| 32 | 6 | -3 | L W W L | |
| 33 | 3 | 0 | W L L | |
| 34 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 35 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 36 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 37 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 38 | 3 | -1 | W L L | |
| 39 | 3 | -1 | L W L | |
| 40 | 3 | -2 | W L L | |
| 41 | 3 | -2 | L L W | |
| 42 | 3 | -2 | L L W | |
| 43 | 3 | -2 | L L W | |
| 44 | 3 | -3 | L W L | |
| 45 | 3 | -3 | L L W | |
| 46 | 3 | -4 | L L W | |
| 47 | 3 | -4 | L L W | |
| 48 | 3 | -4 | L W L | |
| 49 | 3 | -5 | L W L L | |
| 50 | 3 | -5 | L W L | |
| 51 | 3 | -10 | L W L L | |
| 52 | 0 | -4 | L L L | |
| 53 | 0 | -4 | L L L | |
| 54 | 0 | -4 | L L L | |
| 55 | 0 | -4 | L L L | |
| 56 | 0 | -5 | L L L | |
| 57 | 0 | -6 | L L L | |
| 58 | 0 | -6 | L L L | |
| 59 | 0 | -6 | L L L | |
| 60 | 0 | -7 | L L L | |
| 61 | 0 | -7 | L L L | |
| 62 | 0 | -8 | L L L | |
| 63 | 0 | -9 | L L L | |
| 64 | 0 | -9 | L L L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,678.0 | +18.7 | -15.0 | |
| 2 | 1,613.1 | +45.4 | Aligned | |
| 3 | 1,608.8 | -9.4 | -27.0 | |
| 4 | 1,605.7 | -14.8 | -27.0 | |
| 5 | 1,598.3 | +32.6 | Aligned | |
| 6 | 1,597.2 | +10.4 | +2 table | |
| 7 | 1,595.6 | +8.1 | -20.0 | |
| 8 | 1,586.8 | +10.3 | -2.0 | |
| 9 | 1,585.9 | -18.5 | -44.0 | |
| 10 | 1,578.6 | +0.5 | -24.0 | |
| 11 | 1,577.4 | -19.3 | -40.0 | |
| 12 | 1,574.1 | -24.8 | -23.0 | |
| 13 | 1,569.5 | +11.5 | -7.0 | |
| 14 | 1,559.3 | -32.3 | -50.0 | |
| 15 | 1,557.2 | -8.7 | -13.0 | |
| 16 | 1,554.1 | -14.1 | -30.0 | |
| 17 | 1,552.6 | +11.0 | -4.0 | |
| 18 | 1,551.2 | -15.0 | -23.0 | |
| 19 | 1,549.9 | +4.3 | -6.0 | |
| 20 | 1,549.8 | +14.8 | -6.0 | |
| 21 | 1,545.9 | +23.8 | +6 table | |
| 22 | 1,540.3 | +6.7 | +13 table | |
| 23 | 1,533.2 | -23.1 | -32.0 | |
| 24 | 1,529.2 | -40.6 | -39.0 | |
| 25 | 1,528.7 | -14.1 | -34.0 | |
| 26 | 1,524.5 | +19.4 | +8 table | |
| 27 | 1,522.1 | +29.0 | +26 table | |
| 28 | 1,519.9 | +27.0 | +21 table | |
| 29 | 1,519.9 | -21.5 | -29.0 | |
| 30 | 1,519.0 | -35.1 | -31.0 | |
| 31 | 1,518.9 | +36.4 | +17 table | |
| 32 | 1,516.5 | +32.7 | +26 table | |
| 33 | 1,516.0 | -12.8 | -15.0 | |
| 34 | 1,515.7 | -26.9 | -18.0 | |
| 35 | 1,514.4 | +8.6 | +16 table | |
| 36 | 1,513.7 | -0.2 | +12 table | |
| 37 | 1,512.5 | -21.6 | -3.0 | |
| 38 | 1,504.5 | -13.9 | Aligned | |
| 39 | 1,503.4 | +0.5 | -18.0 | |
| 40 | 1,502.0 | +23.4 | +32 table | |
| 41 | 1,497.2 | -20.5 | -2.0 | |
| 42 | 1,495.9 | -8.1 | +20 table | |
| 43 | 1,494.5 | +4.8 | +14 table | |
| 44 | 1,481.1 | -0.1 | +12 table | |
| 45 | 1,480.6 | -11.1 | -9.0 | |
| 46 | 1,475.7 | +23.6 | +33 table | |
| 47 | 1,472.2 | -25.1 | -2.0 | |
| 48 | 1,472.0 | -25.5 | -2.0 | |
| 49 | 1,468.7 | -14.3 | +4 table | |
| 50 | 1,462.4 | +4.0 | +8 table | |
| 51 | 1,459.1 | -26.3 | -5.0 | |
| 52 | 1,454.7 | -20.4 | -8.0 | |
| 53 | 1,446.2 | +48.2 | +41 table | |
| 54 | 1,444.9 | -13.8 | +18 table | |
| 55 | 1,431.1 | -37.9 | -7.0 | |
| 56 | 1,430.2 | +37.8 | +53 table | |
| 57 | 1,426.8 | -0.1 | +13 table | |
| 58 | 1,426.7 | -17.1 | +11 table | |
| 59 | 1,425.9 | +6.2 | +20 table | |
| 60 | 1,424.5 | +8.5 | +37 table | |
| 61 | 1,415.4 | +47.5 | +50 table | |
| 62 | 1,412.4 | +40.8 | +45 table | |
| 63 | 1,401.9 | -0.9 | +26 table | |
| 64 | 1,400.5 | -9.3 | +31 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
AFC Wimbledon
Δ5 +48.2 · Table #12
Top faller
Oldham
Δ5 -40.6 · Table #63
Best attack
Manchester City U21
Attack Elo 1,773.1
Best defense
Cambridge United
Defense Elo 1,674.1
Biggest overperformer
Northampton
Table #3 vs Power #56
Biggest underperformer
Milton Keynes Dons
Table #64 vs Power #14
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
No upcoming fixtures.
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
28
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
33
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Northampton
Table #3 vs Power #56
Value gaps
Overperformers
+53 vs power
+50 vs power
+45 vs power
+41 vs power
+37 vs power
Underperformers
Best value: Lincoln (#16 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Luton (#2 table / #2 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
Top fallers
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
12 pts
12 pts
12 pts
12 pts
12 pts
12 pts
12 pts
12 pts
12 pts
9 pts
9 pts
9 pts
9 pts
9 pts
9 pts
9 pts
9 pts
9 pts
9 pts
6 pts
Relegation
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Safe zone
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
3.85
League scoring profile
Home wins
64.6%
Home edge at league level
Draws
0.0%
Share of level matches
Away wins
35.4%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- This looks like a high-event league: goals per match are comfortably above the typical 2.5 line.
- Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
- Draw frequency is relatively low, so decisive results shape the table faster.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
Best away teams
Best attacks
Best defenses
Goal Heatmap
0-15
78
16.4% of league goals
16-30
58
12.2% of league goals
31-45
78
16.4% of league goals
46-60
73
15.4% of league goals
61-75
74
15.6% of league goals
76-90
114
24.0% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
3
23.6% · 30 matches
4
20.5% · 26 matches
1
14.2% · 18 matches
2
11.8% · 15 matches
6
11.8% · 15 matches
5
7.9% · 10 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 3 goals.
Half-time total goals
2
32.3% · 41 matches
1
29.1% · 37 matches
0
17.3% · 22 matches
3
11.8% · 15 matches
4
7.9% · 10 matches
5
1.6% · 2 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 2 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
3-1
10.2% · 13 matches
2-1
9.4% · 12 matches
0-1
7.9% · 10 matches
1-2
7.1% · 9 matches
1-0
6.3% · 8 matches
4-2
5.5% · 7 matches
3-0
4.7% · 6 matches
2-2
4.7% · 6 matches
Half-time scorelines
0-1
18.1% · 23 matches
1-1
18.1% · 23 matches
0-0
17.3% · 22 matches
1-0
11.0% · 14 matches
2-0
10.2% · 13 matches
2-1
3.9% · 5 matches
3-0
3.9% · 5 matches
0-2
3.9% · 5 matches
Match Stats — EFL Trophy 2025
Goals / match
3.85
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
2.17
Average home goals
Away goals / match
1.57
Average away goals
BTTS
64.6%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
73.2%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
49.6%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
57.5%
Result profile
Draws
11.0%
Result profile
Away wins
31.5%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
19.7%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
15.7%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.21
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
3.06
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.13
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
Luton32026-04-12 16:001Stockport County
Luton22026-03-04 20:301Northampton
Doncaster02026-03-03 21:001Stockport CountyLuton22026-02-24 20:001Plymouth
Swindon Town2026-02-10 20:45Plymouth
AFC Wimbledon12026-02-10 20:002Northampton
Huddersfield12026-02-10 20:001Doncaster
Port Vale02026-02-10 20:004Stockport CountyNorthampton42026-01-14 20:002Walsall
Bolton02026-01-13 20:001Port ValeMomentum leader
AFC Wimbledon
Δ5 +48.2
Cooling team
Oldham
Δ5 -40.6
Risers & fallers
Top risers
Top fallers
League Storylines
Current power leader: Lincoln (Elo 1,678.0). Momentum leader: AFC Wimbledon with a last-five Elo change of +48.2. Most dangerous attack rating: Manchester City U21 (1,773.1). Most stable defensive rating: Cambridge United (1,674.1).
Matches 127Goals 489Average Elo 1,513.2
Top team
Lincoln
Elo 1,678.0
Bottom team
Crawley Town
Elo 1,400.5
Average Elo
1,513.2
League baseline
Spread
277.5
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in EFL Trophy 2025?
Lincoln currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,678.0. The average league Elo is 1,513.2.
vtt 245 , vtd1