2. Division - Group 2 — 2026
Norway
Power leader: KjelsåsHottest: Lørenskog +40.3Power spread: 286.2
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.

League Elo

1,543.2
Current average rating

Power spread

286.2
Top vs bottom
Strongest team
Kjelsås
Elo 1,656.9
Hottest team
Lørenskog
Δ5 +40.3
Goals / Match
3.46
League average
League Elo
1,543.2
Spread 286.2
Teams
14
League clubs
Matches
83
Counted fixtures

Standings vs FootyWow Power

Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.

Official standings

#TeamPtsGDForm
1
Kjelsås
P12 · 9-1-2
2810D L W W L
2
Levanger
P12 · 9-0-3
2712L W W W W
3
Eidsvold
P12 · 8-2-2
2616W W L L W
4
Lørenskog
P12 · 8-2-2
2614W D W W W
5
Hønefoss
P12 · 7-2-3
2310L D L W W
6
Grorud
P12 · 6-2-4
205W W L W L
7
Tromsdalen Uil
P12 · 5-1-6
16-6W W L L L
8
Rana
P11 · 4-2-5
14-2L L W D W
9
Junkeren
P12 · 4-2-6
14-5W L W L D
10
Skeid
P12 · 4-1-7
131W L D L W
11
Stjørdals-Blink
P12 · 3-2-7
11-5D L W W D
12
Ull/Kisa
P12 · 3-0-9
9-21L W W L L
13
Follo
P11 · 2-2-7
8-10L L L L L
14
Trygg/Lade
P12 · 1-1-10
4-19L L L L L
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.

FootyWow power rankings

#TeamEloΔ5Gap
1
Kjelsås
Table #1 · Elite
1,656.9-31.4Aligned
2
Lørenskog
Table #4 · Elite
1,647.7+40.3-2.0
3
Junkeren
Table #9 · Elite
1,614.7-16.8-6.0
4
Hønefoss
Table #5 · Strong
1,596.9+8.6-1.0
5
Levanger
Table #2 · Strong
1,595.3+35.6+3 table
6
Eidsvold
Table #3 · Strong
1,594.4+10.3+3 table
7
Grorud
Table #6 · Stable
1,567.8+14.7+1 table
8
Tromsdalen Uil
Table #7 · Stable
1,534.3-16.1+1 table
9
Trygg/Lade
Table #14 · Stable
1,515.5-66.3-5.0
10
Stjørdals-Blink
Table #11 · Stable
1,506.7+24.5-1.0
11
Rana
Table #8 · Fragile
1,477.7+11.7+3 table
12
Ull/Kisa
Table #12 · Fragile
1,474.3-5.1Aligned
13
Skeid
Table #10 · Fragile
1,452.4+14.8+3 table
14
Follo
Table #13 · Relegation risk
1,370.7-39.5+1 table
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.

Official standings

#TeamPtsGDForm
1
Kjelsås
P12 · 9-1-2
2810D L W W L
2
Levanger
P12 · 9-0-3
2712L W W W W
3
Eidsvold
P12 · 8-2-2
2616W W L L W
4
Lørenskog
P12 · 8-2-2
2614W D W W W
5
Hønefoss
P12 · 7-2-3
2310L D L W W
6
Grorud
P12 · 6-2-4
205W W L W L
7
Tromsdalen Uil
P12 · 5-1-6
16-6W W L L L
8
Rana
P11 · 4-2-5
14-2L L W D W
9
Junkeren
P12 · 4-2-6
14-5W L W L D
10
Skeid
P12 · 4-1-7
131W L D L W
11
Stjørdals-Blink
P12 · 3-2-7
11-5D L W W D
12
Ull/Kisa
P12 · 3-0-9
9-21L W W L L
13
Follo
P11 · 2-2-7
8-10L L L L L
14
Trygg/Lade
P12 · 1-1-10
4-19L L L L L
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.

FootyWow power rankings

#TeamEloΔ5Gap
1
Kjelsås
Table #1 · Elite
1,656.9-31.4Aligned
2
Lørenskog
Table #4 · Elite
1,647.7+40.3-2.0
3
Junkeren
Table #9 · Elite
1,614.7-16.8-6.0
4
Hønefoss
Table #5 · Strong
1,596.9+8.6-1.0
5
Levanger
Table #2 · Strong
1,595.3+35.6+3 table
6
Eidsvold
Table #3 · Strong
1,594.4+10.3+3 table
7
Grorud
Table #6 · Stable
1,567.8+14.7+1 table
8
Tromsdalen Uil
Table #7 · Stable
1,534.3-16.1+1 table
9
Trygg/Lade
Table #14 · Stable
1,515.5-66.3-5.0
10
Stjørdals-Blink
Table #11 · Stable
1,506.7+24.5-1.0
11
Rana
Table #8 · Fragile
1,477.7+11.7+3 table
12
Ull/Kisa
Table #12 · Fragile
1,474.3-5.1Aligned
13
Skeid
Table #10 · Fragile
1,452.4+14.8+3 table
14
Follo
Table #13 · Relegation risk
1,370.7-39.5+1 table
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.

League Pulse

Top riser
Lørenskog
Δ5 +40.3 · Table #4
Top faller
Trygg/Lade
Δ5 -66.3 · Table #14
Best attack
Lørenskog
Attack Elo 1,815.1
Best defense
Lørenskog
Defense Elo 1,627.0
Biggest overperformer
Levanger
Table #2 vs Power #5
Biggest underperformer
Junkeren
Table #9 vs Power #3

Upcoming Fixtures That Matter

No upcoming fixtures.

Table vs Power Insights

Overperformers

4
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power

Underperformers

3
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place

Largest gap

Junkeren
Table #9 vs Power #3

Value gaps

Overperformers

Table #2 · Power #5
+3 vs power
Table #3 · Power #6
+3 vs power
Table #8 · Power #11
+3 vs power
Table #10 · Power #13
+3 vs power

Underperformers

Table #4 · Power #2
+2 value
Table #9 · Power #3
+6 value
Table #14 · Power #9
+5 value
Best value: Lørenskog (#4 table / #2 Elo)Most fragile top team: Kjelsås (#1 table / #1 Elo)

Momentum by team

Top risers

Overall Elo 1,647.7 · Form 1,667.3
+40.3
Overall Elo 1,595.3 · Form 1,629.6
+35.6
Overall Elo 1,506.7 · Form 1,508.0
+24.5
Overall Elo 1,452.4 · Form 1,458.0
+14.8
Overall Elo 1,567.8 · Form 1,579.8
+14.7

Top fallers

Overall Elo 1,515.5 · Form 1,465.7
-66.3
Overall Elo 1,370.7 · Form 1,359.8
-39.5
Overall Elo 1,656.9 · Form 1,656.2
-31.4
Overall Elo 1,614.7 · Form 1,594.1
-16.8
Overall Elo 1,534.3 · Form 1,514.4
-16.1

Race Tracker

Title

#1 table · Leader pack
28 pts
Elo 1,656.9
#2 table · Leader pack
27 pts
Elo 1,595.3
#3 table · Leader pack
26 pts
Elo 1,594.4

Playoffs / upper push

#4 table · Upper-table pressure
26 pts
Elo 1,647.7
#5 table · Upper-table pressure
23 pts
Elo 1,596.9
#6 table · Upper-table pressure
20 pts
Elo 1,567.8

Relegation

#10 table · Pressure zone
13 pts
Elo 1,452.4
#11 table · Pressure zone
11 pts
Elo 1,506.7
#12 table · Pressure zone
9 pts
Elo 1,474.3
#13 table · Pressure zone
8 pts
Elo 1,370.7
#14 table · Pressure zone
4 pts
Elo 1,515.5

Safe zone

#7 table · Breathing room
16 pts
Elo 1,534.3
#8 table · Breathing room
14 pts
Elo 1,477.7
#9 table · Breathing room
14 pts
Elo 1,614.7

League Character & Splits

Goals / match

3.46
League scoring profile

Home wins

49.4%
Home edge at league level

Draws

12.0%
Share of level matches

Away wins

38.6%
Away resilience

Over / Under Goals Trend

LineOverUnder
0.5
Over: 95.2%
Under: 4.8%
1.5
Over: 84.3%
Under: 15.7%
2.5
Over: 73.5%
Under: 26.5%
3.5
Over: 41%
Under: 59%
4.5
Over: 31.3%
Under: 68.7%

Stability / chaos notes

  • This looks like a high-event league: goals per match are comfortably above the typical 2.5 line.
  • Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
  • Draw frequency is relatively low, so decisive results shape the table faster.

Home-away strength and power splits

Best home teams

Table #9
1,585.8
Home Elo
Table #4
1,559.8
Home Elo
Table #5
1,557.9
Home Elo
Table #14
1,552.2
Home Elo
Table #1
1,547.3
Home Elo

Best away teams

Table #1
1,590.5
Away Elo
Table #4
1,586.0
Away Elo
Table #2
1,550.9
Away Elo
Table #3
1,540.9
Away Elo
Table #9
1,539.8
Away Elo

Best attacks

Table #4
1,815.1
Attack Elo
Table #9
1,785.7
Attack Elo
Table #5
1,754.4
Attack Elo
Table #2
1,729.7
Attack Elo
Table #1
1,724.1
Attack Elo

Best defenses

Table #4
1,627.0
Defense Elo
Table #6
1,570.9
Defense Elo
Table #1
1,544.1
Defense Elo
Table #9
1,522.4
Defense Elo
Table #3
1,503.2
Defense Elo

Goal Heatmap

0-15
35
12.2% of league goals
16-30
43
15.0% of league goals
31-45
49
17.1% of league goals
46-60
42
14.7% of league goals
61-75
47
16.4% of league goals
76-90
70
24.5% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.

Frequent Total Goals

Full-time total goals

3
32.5% · 27 matches
5
19.3% · 16 matches
2
10.8% · 9 matches
1
10.8% · 9 matches
4
9.6% · 8 matches
6
7.2% · 6 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 3 goals.

Half-time total goals

1
36.1% · 30 matches
2
26.5% · 22 matches
0
18.1% · 15 matches
3
12.0% · 10 matches
4
7.2% · 6 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 1 goals.

Frequent Scorelines

Full-time scorelines

2-1
12.0% · 10 matches
1-2
10.8% · 9 matches
3-0
7.2% · 6 matches
2-3
7.2% · 6 matches
1-0
6.0% · 5 matches
3-2
6.0% · 5 matches
1-1
4.8% · 4 matches
1-3
4.8% · 4 matches

Half-time scorelines

0-1
19.3% · 16 matches
0-0
18.1% · 15 matches
1-0
16.9% · 14 matches
1-1
15.7% · 13 matches
3-0
7.2% · 6 matches
2-0
7.2% · 6 matches
0-2
3.6% · 3 matches
2-1
2.4% · 2 matches

Match Stats — 2. Division - Group 2 2026

Goals / match
3.46
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
1.89
Average home goals
Away goals / match
1.55
Average away goals
BTTS
66.3%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
73.5%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
41.0%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
48.2%
Result profile
Draws
13.3%
Result profile
Away wins
38.6%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
22.9%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
14.5%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.29
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
3.51
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.10
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.

Recent Fixtures & Momentum

Momentum leader

Lørenskog
Δ5 +40.3

Cooling team

Trygg/Lade
Δ5 -66.3

Risers & fallers

Top risers

Overall Elo 1,647.7 · Form 1,667.3
+40.3
Overall Elo 1,595.3 · Form 1,629.6
+35.6
Overall Elo 1,506.7 · Form 1,508.0
+24.5
Overall Elo 1,452.4 · Form 1,458.0
+14.8
Overall Elo 1,567.8 · Form 1,579.8
+14.7

Top fallers

Overall Elo 1,515.5 · Form 1,465.7
-66.3
Overall Elo 1,370.7 · Form 1,359.8
-39.5
Overall Elo 1,656.9 · Form 1,656.2
-31.4
Overall Elo 1,614.7 · Form 1,594.1
-16.8
Overall Elo 1,534.3 · Form 1,514.4
-16.1

League Storylines

Current power leader: Kjelsås (Elo 1,656.9). Momentum leader: Lørenskog with a last-five Elo change of +40.3. Most dangerous attack rating: Lørenskog (1,815.1). Most stable defensive rating: Lørenskog (1,627.0).
Matches 83Goals 287Average Elo 1,543.2

Top team

Kjelsås
Elo 1,656.9

Bottom team

Follo
Elo 1,370.7

Average Elo

1,543.2
League baseline

Spread

286.2
Top vs bottom

FAQ & Methodology

What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?

They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.

Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?

The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.

Who is the current power leader in 2. Division - Group 2 2026?

Kjelsås currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,656.9. The average league Elo is 1,543.2.