1. Liga — 2026
Latvia
Power leader: Riga MarinersHottest: Metta / LU +60.9Power spread: 238.5
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
Strongest team
Riga Mariners
Elo 1,637.6
Hottest team
Metta / LU
Δ5 +60.9
Goals / Match
3.73
League average
League Elo
1,503.6
Spread 238.5
Teams
14
League clubs
Matches
33
Counted fixtures

Standings vs FootyWow Power

Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.

Official standings

#TeamPtsGDForm
1
P5 · 5-0-0
1520W W W W W
2
P5 · 5-0-0
1513W W W W W
3
P5 · 3-2-0
114W D W D W
4
P5 · 3-2-0
114W W D D W
5
P5 · 2-2-1
82W D W D L
6
P5 · 2-1-2
76W W D L L
7
P5 · 2-1-2
7-1L L W D W
8
P4 · 2-0-2
61L L W W
9
P4 · 1-1-2
40L L W D
10
P5 · 0-3-2
3-12D D L D L
11
P5 · 0-2-3
2-5L D D L L
12
P3 · 0-1-2
1-4L D L
13
P5 · 0-1-4
1-10D L L L L
14
P5 · 0-0-5
0-18L L L L L
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.

FootyWow power rankings

#TeamEloΔ5Gap
1
Table #3 · Elite
1,637.6+14.1-2.0
2
Table #8 · Elite
1,593.0-12.7-6.0
3
Table #2 · Elite
1,550.3+59.4+1 table
4
Table #4 · Strong
1,543.9+33.1Aligned
5
Table #9 · Strong
1,523.2-14.9-4.0
6
Table #1 · Strong
1,520.5+60.9+5 table
7
Table #5 · Stable
1,517.3+17.2+2 table
8
Table #11 · Stable
1,500.7-38.9-3.0
9
Table #13 · Stable
1,484.4-57.1-4.0
10
Table #7 · Stable
1,474.8+9.6+3 table
11
Table #6 · Fragile
1,470.3+13.7+5 table
12
Table #10 · Fragile
1,427.5-13.6+2 table
13
Table #12 · Fragile
1,408.3-15.0+1 table
14
Table #14 · Relegation risk
1,399.1-55.8Aligned
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.

Official standings

#TeamPtsGDForm
1
P5 · 5-0-0
1520W W W W W
2
P5 · 5-0-0
1513W W W W W
3
P5 · 3-2-0
114W D W D W
4
P5 · 3-2-0
114W W D D W
5
P5 · 2-2-1
82W D W D L
6
P5 · 2-1-2
76W W D L L
7
P5 · 2-1-2
7-1L L W D W
8
P4 · 2-0-2
61L L W W
9
P4 · 1-1-2
40L L W D
10
P5 · 0-3-2
3-12D D L D L
11
P5 · 0-2-3
2-5L D D L L
12
P3 · 0-1-2
1-4L D L
13
P5 · 0-1-4
1-10D L L L L
14
P5 · 0-0-5
0-18L L L L L
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.

FootyWow power rankings

#TeamEloΔ5Gap
1
Table #3 · Elite
1,637.6+14.1-2.0
2
Table #8 · Elite
1,593.0-12.7-6.0
3
Table #2 · Elite
1,550.3+59.4+1 table
4
Table #4 · Strong
1,543.9+33.1Aligned
5
Table #9 · Strong
1,523.2-14.9-4.0
6
Table #1 · Strong
1,520.5+60.9+5 table
7
Table #5 · Stable
1,517.3+17.2+2 table
8
Table #11 · Stable
1,500.7-38.9-3.0
9
Table #13 · Stable
1,484.4-57.1-4.0
10
Table #7 · Stable
1,474.8+9.6+3 table
11
Table #6 · Fragile
1,470.3+13.7+5 table
12
Table #10 · Fragile
1,427.5-13.6+2 table
13
Table #12 · Fragile
1,408.3-15.0+1 table
14
Table #14 · Relegation risk
1,399.1-55.8Aligned
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.

League Pulse

Top riser
Metta / LU
Δ5 +60.9 · Table #1
Top faller
Rīgas FS II
Δ5 -57.1 · Table #13
Best attack
Riga Mariners
Attack Elo 1,800.0
Best defense
JDFS Alberts
Defense Elo 1,577.2
Biggest overperformer
Metta / LU
Table #1 vs Power #6
Biggest underperformer
JDFS Alberts
Table #8 vs Power #2

Table vs Power Insights

Overperformers

5
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power

Underperformers

5
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place

Largest gap

JDFS Alberts
Table #8 vs Power #2

Value gaps

Overperformers

Table #1 · Power #6
+5 vs power
Table #6 · Power #11
+5 vs power
Table #7 · Power #10
+3 vs power
Table #5 · Power #7
+2 vs power
Table #10 · Power #12
+2 vs power

Underperformers

Table #3 · Power #1
+2 value
Table #8 · Power #2
+6 value
Table #9 · Power #5
+4 value
Table #11 · Power #8
+3 value
Table #13 · Power #9
+4 value
Best value: Riga Mariners (#3 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Riga Mariners (#3 table / #1 Elo)

Momentum by team

Top risers

Overall Elo 1,520.5 · Form 1,574.8
+60.9
Overall Elo 1,550.3 · Form 1,600.8
+59.4
Overall Elo 1,543.9 · Form 1,571.8
+33.1
Overall Elo 1,517.3 · Form 1,525.6
+17.2
Overall Elo 1,637.6 · Form 1,649.6
+14.1

Top fallers

Overall Elo 1,484.4 · Form 1,433.5
-57.1
Overall Elo 1,399.1 · Form 1,350.8
-55.8
Overall Elo 1,500.7 · Form 1,463.8
-38.9
Overall Elo 1,408.3 · Form 1,387.9
-15.0
Overall Elo 1,523.2 · Form 1,513.2
-14.9

Race Tracker

Title

#1 table · Leader pack
15 pts
Elo 1,520.5
#2 table · Leader pack
15 pts
Elo 1,550.3
#3 table · Leader pack
11 pts
Elo 1,637.6

Playoffs / upper push

#4 table · Upper-table pressure
11 pts
Elo 1,543.9
#5 table · Upper-table pressure
8 pts
Elo 1,517.3
#6 table · Upper-table pressure
7 pts
Elo 1,470.3

Relegation

#9 table · Pressure zone
4 pts
Elo 1,523.2
#10 table · Pressure zone
3 pts
Elo 1,427.5
#11 table · Pressure zone
2 pts
Elo 1,500.7
#12 table · Pressure zone
1 pts
Elo 1,408.3
#13 table · Pressure zone
1 pts
Elo 1,484.4
#14 table · Pressure zone
0 pts
Elo 1,399.1

Safe zone

#7 table · Breathing room
7 pts
Elo 1,474.8
#8 table · Breathing room
6 pts
Elo 1,593.0

League Character & Splits

Goals / match

3.73
League scoring profile

Home wins

39.4%
Home edge at league level

Draws

24.2%
Share of level matches

Away wins

36.4%
Away resilience

Over / Under Goals Trend

LineOverUnder
0.5
Over: 93.9%
Under: 6.1%
1.5
Over: 90.9%
Under: 9.1%
2.5
Over: 75.8%
Under: 24.2%
3.5
Over: 57.6%
Under: 42.4%
4.5
Over: 27.3%
Under: 72.7%

Stability / chaos notes

  • This looks like a high-event league: goals per match are comfortably above the typical 2.5 line.
  • Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
  • Draw frequency sits in the middle, which keeps both form and raw quality relevant.

Home-away strength and power splits

Best home teams

Table #8
1,559.7
Home Elo
1,545.6
Home Elo
1,538.1
Home Elo
Table #5
1,507.5
Home Elo
Table #7
1,503.3
Home Elo

Best away teams

1,579.9
Away Elo
Table #8
1,536.8
Away Elo
Table #9
1,528.3
Away Elo
Table #4
1,526.6
Away Elo
Table #11
1,522.9
Away Elo

Best attacks

1,800.0
Attack Elo
1,711.0
Attack Elo
Table #1
1,692.2
Attack Elo
Table #8
1,652.6
Attack Elo
Table #9
1,567.3
Attack Elo

Best defenses

Table #8
1,577.2
Defense Elo
Table #6
1,523.9
Defense Elo
Table #11
1,512.7
Defense Elo
Table #5
1,508.5
Defense Elo
Table #13
1,486.1
Defense Elo

Goal Heatmap

0-15
15
13.0% of league goals
16-30
17
14.8% of league goals
31-45
14
12.2% of league goals
46-60
20
17.4% of league goals
61-75
21
18.3% of league goals
76-90
28
24.3% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.

Frequent Total Goals

Full-time total goals

4
30.3% · 10 matches
3
18.2% · 6 matches
2
15.2% · 5 matches
6
12.1% · 4 matches
5
9.1% · 3 matches
0
6.1% · 2 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 4 goals.

Half-time total goals

1
42.4% · 14 matches
0
21.2% · 7 matches
3
18.2% · 6 matches
2
12.1% · 4 matches
4
3.0% · 1 matches
5
3.0% · 1 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 1 goals.

Frequent Scorelines

Full-time scorelines

2-1
9.1% · 3 matches
4-0
9.1% · 3 matches
1-3
9.1% · 3 matches
2-3
6.1% · 2 matches
3-1
6.1% · 2 matches
1-2
6.1% · 2 matches
2-0
6.1% · 2 matches
2-2
6.1% · 2 matches

Half-time scorelines

1-0
24.2% · 8 matches
0-0
21.2% · 7 matches
0-1
18.2% · 6 matches
1-2
9.1% · 3 matches
2-0
6.1% · 2 matches
2-1
6.1% · 2 matches
1-1
6.1% · 2 matches
3-0
3.0% · 1 matches

Match Stats — 1. Liga 2026

Goals / match
3.73
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
2.06
Average home goals
Away goals / match
1.67
Average away goals
BTTS
63.6%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
75.8%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
57.6%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
39.4%
Result profile
Draws
24.2%
Result profile
Away wins
36.4%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
27.3%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
15.2%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.09
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
0.12
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.18
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.

Recent Fixtures & Momentum

Momentum leader

Metta / LU
Δ5 +60.9

Cooling team

Rīgas FS II
Δ5 -57.1

Risers & fallers

Top risers

Overall Elo 1,520.5 · Form 1,574.8
+60.9
Overall Elo 1,550.3 · Form 1,600.8
+59.4
Overall Elo 1,543.9 · Form 1,571.8
+33.1
Overall Elo 1,517.3 · Form 1,525.6
+17.2
Overall Elo 1,637.6 · Form 1,649.6
+14.1

Top fallers

Overall Elo 1,484.4 · Form 1,433.5
-57.1
Overall Elo 1,399.1 · Form 1,350.8
-55.8
Overall Elo 1,500.7 · Form 1,463.8
-38.9
Overall Elo 1,408.3 · Form 1,387.9
-15.0
Overall Elo 1,523.2 · Form 1,513.2
-14.9

League Storylines

Current power leader: Riga Mariners (Elo 1,637.6). Momentum leader: Metta / LU with a last-five Elo change of +60.9. Most dangerous attack rating: Riga Mariners (1,800.0). Most stable defensive rating: JDFS Alberts (1,577.2). Featured next fixture by combined Elo: Metta / LU vs Valmiera / BSS at 2026-05-02 17:00.
Matches 33Goals 123Average Elo 1,503.6

Top team

Riga Mariners
Elo 1,637.6

Bottom team

Rēzekne FA
Elo 1,399.1

Average Elo

1,503.6
League baseline

Spread

238.5
Top vs bottom

FAQ & Methodology

What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?

They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.

Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?

The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.

Who is the current power leader in 1. Liga 2026?

Riga Mariners currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,637.6. The average league Elo is 1,503.6.