FA Cup — 2026
ChinaPower leader: Shenzhen 2028Hottest: Jiangxi Liansheng +17.3Power spread: 142.3
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
League Elo
1,488.9
Current average rating
Power spread
142.3
Top vs bottom
Strongest team
Shenzhen 2028
Elo 1,560.2
Hottest team
Jiangxi Liansheng
Δ5 +17.3
Goals / Match
2.00
League average
League Elo
1,488.9
Spread 142.3
Teams
18
League clubs
Matches
9
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 7 | W | |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 3 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 13 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 14 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 16 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 17 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 18 | 0 | -7 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,560.2 | +10.7 | -5.0 | |
| 2 | 1,549.5 | -1.9 | -9.0 | |
| 4 | 1,537.3 | +17.3 | +3 table | |
| 5 | 1,528.0 | +0.9 | -4.0 | |
| 6 | 1,523.6 | +8.3 | +4 table | |
| 9 | 1,518.1 | -10.2 | -4.0 | |
| 11 | 1,510.2 | +10.2 | +7 table | |
| 14 | 1,499.1 | -0.9 | +2 table | |
| 16 | 1,496.5 | -3.5 | +8 table | |
| 19 | 1,484.5 | -15.5 | +3 table | |
| 22 | 1,479.7 | +15.5 | +19 table | |
| 23 | 1,473.4 | -10.7 | +8 table | |
| 25 | 1,464.0 | -17.3 | +7 table | |
| 26 | 1,462.3 | +8.4 | +21 table | |
| 27 | 1,445.0 | +3.5 | +20 table | |
| 28 | 1,442.5 | -8.3 | +11 table | |
| 29 | 1,439.1 | +1.9 | +19 table | |
| 31 | 1,417.9 | -8.4 | +17 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 7 | W | |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 3 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 13 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 14 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 16 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 17 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 18 | 0 | -7 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,560.2 | +10.7 | -5.0 | |
| 2 | 1,549.5 | -1.9 | -9.0 | |
| 4 | 1,537.3 | +17.3 | +3 table | |
| 5 | 1,528.0 | +0.9 | -4.0 | |
| 6 | 1,523.6 | +8.3 | +4 table | |
| 9 | 1,518.1 | -10.2 | -4.0 | |
| 11 | 1,510.2 | +10.2 | +7 table | |
| 14 | 1,499.1 | -0.9 | +2 table | |
| 16 | 1,496.5 | -3.5 | +8 table | |
| 19 | 1,484.5 | -15.5 | +3 table | |
| 22 | 1,479.7 | +15.5 | +19 table | |
| 23 | 1,473.4 | -10.7 | +8 table | |
| 25 | 1,464.0 | -17.3 | +7 table | |
| 26 | 1,462.3 | +8.4 | +21 table | |
| 27 | 1,445.0 | +3.5 | +20 table | |
| 28 | 1,442.5 | -8.3 | +11 table | |
| 29 | 1,439.1 | +1.9 | +19 table | |
| 31 | 1,417.9 | -8.4 | +17 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
Jiangxi Liansheng
Δ5 +17.3 · Table #1
Top faller
Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong
Δ5 -17.3 · Table #18
Best attack
Nantong Haimen Codion
Attack Elo 1,602.5
Best defense
Guangzhou Dandelion
Defense Elo 1,592.3
Biggest overperformer
Shanghai Second
Table #5 vs Power #26
Biggest underperformer
Nantong Haimen Codion
Table #11 vs Power #2
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
No upcoming fixtures.
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
14
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
4
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Shanghai Second
Table #5 vs Power #26
Value gaps
Overperformers
+21 vs power
+20 vs power
+19 vs power
+19 vs power
+17 vs power
Underperformers
+5 value
+9 value
+4 value
+4 value
Best value: Shenzhen 2028 (#6 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Shenzhen 2028 (#6 table / #1 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
+17.3
+15.5
+10.7
+10.2
+8.4
Top fallers
-15.5
-10.7
-10.2
-8.4
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
Relegation
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Safe zone
No live race cluster.
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
2.00
League scoring profile
Home wins
33.3%
Home edge at league level
Draws
33.3%
Share of level matches
Away wins
33.3%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- This looks like a lower-event league: goals per match sit below the usual high-scoring threshold.
- Power spread is healthy but not dominant, so context still matters more than pure status.
- Draw frequency is high, which often means fewer easy separation spots between mid-table teams.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
1,545.7
1,532.7
1,516.9
1,514.6
1,506.6
Best away teams
1,543.6
1,542.1
1,506.2
1,500.4
1,500.0
Best attacks
1,602.5
1,592.4
1,505.1
1,497.1
1,495.9
Best defenses
1,592.3
1,582.7
1,567.2
1,550.1
1,546.5
Goal Heatmap
0-15
1
5.6% of league goals
16-30
2
11.1% of league goals
31-45
6
33.3% of league goals
46-60
3
16.7% of league goals
61-75
4
22.2% of league goals
76-90
2
11.1% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 31-45. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
2
31.3% · 5 matches
1
25.0% · 4 matches
0
12.5% · 2 matches
3
12.5% · 2 matches
7
6.3% · 1 matches
5
6.3% · 1 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 2 goals.
Half-time total goals
0
43.8% · 7 matches
1
37.5% · 6 matches
2
6.3% · 1 matches
5
6.3% · 1 matches
3
6.3% · 1 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 0 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
0-1
12.5% · 2 matches
0-0
12.5% · 2 matches
1-0
12.5% · 2 matches
2-1
12.5% · 2 matches
2-0
12.5% · 2 matches
0-2
12.5% · 2 matches
0-7
6.3% · 1 matches
1-1
6.3% · 1 matches
Half-time scorelines
0-0
43.8% · 7 matches
0-1
18.8% · 3 matches
1-0
18.8% · 3 matches
1-1
6.3% · 1 matches
0-5
6.3% · 1 matches
3-0
6.3% · 1 matches
Match Stats — FA Cup 2026
Goals / match
2.00
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
1.00
Average home goals
Away goals / match
1.38
Average away goals
BTTS
31.3%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
31.3%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
18.8%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
43.8%
Result profile
Draws
18.8%
Result profile
Away wins
37.5%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
25.0%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
31.3%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
2.13
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
0.13
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.19
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
Xiamen Chengyi02026-04-20 09:001Shenzhen 2028
Yunnan Cuanhe02026-04-19 13:350Guangzhou Dandelion
Hubei Chufeng Heli02026-04-19 10:300Nantong Haimen Codion
Shanghai Second12026-04-19 09:300Guangdong Mingtu
Guizhou Xufengtang22026-04-19 09:301Tai'an Tiankuang
Dalian Kewei22026-04-19 09:000Yichun Grand Tiger
Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong02026-04-19 09:007Jiangxi Liansheng
Liaocheng Legend12026-04-19 09:001BIT
Qingdao Fuli02026-04-19 09:002Xi'an Ronghai
Guangdong Shudihong12026-04-18 13:354Rizhao Yuqi
Momentum leader
Jiangxi Liansheng
Δ5 +17.3
Cooling team
Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong
Δ5 -17.3
Risers & fallers
Top risers
+17.3
+15.5
+10.7
+10.2
+8.4
Top fallers
-15.5
-10.7
-10.2
-8.4
League Storylines
Current power leader: Shenzhen 2028 (Elo 1,560.2). Momentum leader: Jiangxi Liansheng with a last-five Elo change of +17.3. Most dangerous attack rating: Nantong Haimen Codion (1,602.5). Most stable defensive rating: Guangzhou Dandelion (1,592.3).
Matches 9Goals 18Average Elo 1,488.9
Top team
Shenzhen 2028
Elo 1,560.2
Bottom team
Guangdong Mingtu
Elo 1,417.9
Average Elo
1,488.9
League baseline
Spread
142.3
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in FA Cup 2026?
Shenzhen 2028 currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,560.2. The average league Elo is 1,488.9.
vtt 2 , vtd1