Copa Argentina — 2026
ArgentinaPower leader: Independ. RivadaviaHottest: Gimnasia L.P. +17.0Power spread: 206.8
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
Strongest team
Independ. Rivadavia
Elo 1,631.3
Hottest team
Gimnasia L.P.
Δ5 +17.0
Goals / Match
2.72
League average
League Elo
1,532.7
Spread 206.8
Teams
64
League clubs
Matches
32
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 5 | W | |
| 2 | 3 | 4 | W | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 9 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 10 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 11 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 12 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 13 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 14 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 15 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 16 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 17 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 18 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 19 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 22 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 23 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 24 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 25 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 26 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 27 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 28 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 29 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 30 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 31 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 32 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 33 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 34 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 35 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 36 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 37 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 38 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 39 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 40 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 41 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 42 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 43 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 44 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 45 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 46 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 51 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 52 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 53 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 54 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 55 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 56 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 57 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 58 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 59 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 60 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 61 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 62 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 63 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 64 | 0 | -5 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,631.3 | +11.2 | -11.0 | |
| 2 | 1,627.8 | +12.7 | Aligned | |
| 3 | 1,622.6 | +9.7 | -8.0 | |
| 4 | 1,614.6 | +9.6 | -26.0 | |
| 5 | 1,604.4 | +8.1 | -9.0 | |
| 6 | 1,603.6 | -0.9 | -29.0 | |
| 7 | 1,603.4 | +9.6 | +3 table | |
| 8 | 1,599.4 | -17.0 | -50.0 | |
| 9 | 1,599.0 | -14.2 | -51.0 | |
| 10 | 1,592.2 | -9.6 | -30.0 | |
| 11 | 1,589.6 | +10.4 | +2 table | |
| 12 | 1,588.0 | +8.9 | -11.0 | |
| 13 | 1,587.8 | -15.3 | -48.0 | |
| 14 | 1,586.9 | +1.0 | -6.0 | |
| 15 | 1,585.6 | +9.1 | -10.0 | |
| 16 | 1,581.5 | +0.9 | -8.0 | |
| 17 | 1,578.7 | +0.2 | -17.0 | |
| 18 | 1,565.1 | +9.2 | -11.0 | |
| 19 | 1,564.7 | -8.9 | -18.0 | |
| 20 | 1,561.5 | -14.3 | -33.0 | |
| 21 | 1,558.9 | +14.2 | +13 table | |
| 22 | 1,555.1 | +10.3 | +17 table | |
| 23 | 1,553.7 | -2.9 | -20.0 | |
| 24 | 1,551.0 | -9.2 | -21.0 | |
| 25 | 1,538.0 | -11.6 | -21.0 | |
| 26 | 1,533.5 | -10.4 | -21.0 | |
| 27 | 1,532.4 | -13.2 | -11.0 | |
| 28 | 1,532.1 | -0.2 | +9 table | |
| 29 | 1,531.4 | -11.2 | -22.0 | |
| 30 | 1,530.5 | 0.0 | -22.0 | |
| 31 | 1,528.3 | +14.0 | +30 table | |
| 32 | 1,527.9 | -10.0 | -7.0 | |
| 33 | 1,525.3 | -9.7 | -21.0 | |
| 34 | 1,522.9 | -8.1 | -22.0 | |
| 35 | 1,519.1 | -12.5 | -13.0 | |
| 36 | 1,517.9 | 0.0 | +19 table | |
| 37 | 1,515.1 | +12.5 | +19 table | |
| 38 | 1,513.5 | +7.0 | +16 table | |
| 39 | 1,510.2 | -11.6 | -11.0 | |
| 40 | 1,509.9 | +10.0 | +12 table | |
| 41 | 1,508.7 | +2.9 | +14 table | |
| 42 | 1,508.4 | +17.0 | +39 table | |
| 43 | 1,507.2 | +11.6 | +30 table | |
| 44 | 1,505.3 | +1.7 | +13 table | |
| 45 | 1,504.1 | 0.0 | +29 table | |
| 46 | 1,503.9 | +15.3 | +39 table | |
| 47 | 1,502.4 | -10.3 | -10.0 | |
| 48 | 1,501.0 | -1.0 | +15 table | |
| 49 | 1,499.8 | 0.0 | Aligned | |
| 50 | 1,499.3 | 0.0 | +40 table | |
| 51 | 1,498.2 | -12.7 | -12.0 | |
| 52 | 1,493.2 | -9.6 | -7.0 | |
| 53 | 1,491.0 | -14.0 | -11.0 | |
| 54 | 1,483.9 | -9.5 | +13 table | |
| 55 | 1,476.9 | +14.3 | +40 table | |
| 56 | 1,475.8 | +11.6 | +24 table | |
| 57 | 1,473.3 | +9.5 | +31 table | |
| 58 | 1,471.6 | -9.1 | +14 table | |
| 59 | 1,467.0 | -1.7 | +17 table | |
| 60 | 1,462.4 | -7.0 | +24 table | |
| 61 | 1,451.3 | -12.1 | -1.0 | |
| 62 | 1,448.5 | +13.2 | +41 table | |
| 63 | 1,441.3 | 0.0 | +8 table | |
| 64 | 1,424.5 | +12.1 | +58 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 5 | W | |
| 2 | 3 | 4 | W | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 9 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 10 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 11 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 12 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 13 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 14 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 15 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 16 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 17 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 18 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 19 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 22 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 23 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 24 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 25 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 26 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 27 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 28 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 29 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 30 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 31 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 32 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 33 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 34 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 35 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 36 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 37 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 38 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 39 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 40 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 41 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 42 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 43 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 44 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 45 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 46 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 51 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 52 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 53 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 54 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 55 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 56 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 57 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 58 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 59 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 60 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 61 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 62 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 63 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 64 | 0 | -5 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,631.3 | +11.2 | -11.0 | |
| 2 | 1,627.8 | +12.7 | Aligned | |
| 3 | 1,622.6 | +9.7 | -8.0 | |
| 4 | 1,614.6 | +9.6 | -26.0 | |
| 5 | 1,604.4 | +8.1 | -9.0 | |
| 6 | 1,603.6 | -0.9 | -29.0 | |
| 7 | 1,603.4 | +9.6 | +3 table | |
| 8 | 1,599.4 | -17.0 | -50.0 | |
| 9 | 1,599.0 | -14.2 | -51.0 | |
| 10 | 1,592.2 | -9.6 | -30.0 | |
| 11 | 1,589.6 | +10.4 | +2 table | |
| 12 | 1,588.0 | +8.9 | -11.0 | |
| 13 | 1,587.8 | -15.3 | -48.0 | |
| 14 | 1,586.9 | +1.0 | -6.0 | |
| 15 | 1,585.6 | +9.1 | -10.0 | |
| 16 | 1,581.5 | +0.9 | -8.0 | |
| 17 | 1,578.7 | +0.2 | -17.0 | |
| 18 | 1,565.1 | +9.2 | -11.0 | |
| 19 | 1,564.7 | -8.9 | -18.0 | |
| 20 | 1,561.5 | -14.3 | -33.0 | |
| 21 | 1,558.9 | +14.2 | +13 table | |
| 22 | 1,555.1 | +10.3 | +17 table | |
| 23 | 1,553.7 | -2.9 | -20.0 | |
| 24 | 1,551.0 | -9.2 | -21.0 | |
| 25 | 1,538.0 | -11.6 | -21.0 | |
| 26 | 1,533.5 | -10.4 | -21.0 | |
| 27 | 1,532.4 | -13.2 | -11.0 | |
| 28 | 1,532.1 | -0.2 | +9 table | |
| 29 | 1,531.4 | -11.2 | -22.0 | |
| 30 | 1,530.5 | 0.0 | -22.0 | |
| 31 | 1,528.3 | +14.0 | +30 table | |
| 32 | 1,527.9 | -10.0 | -7.0 | |
| 33 | 1,525.3 | -9.7 | -21.0 | |
| 34 | 1,522.9 | -8.1 | -22.0 | |
| 35 | 1,519.1 | -12.5 | -13.0 | |
| 36 | 1,517.9 | 0.0 | +19 table | |
| 37 | 1,515.1 | +12.5 | +19 table | |
| 38 | 1,513.5 | +7.0 | +16 table | |
| 39 | 1,510.2 | -11.6 | -11.0 | |
| 40 | 1,509.9 | +10.0 | +12 table | |
| 41 | 1,508.7 | +2.9 | +14 table | |
| 42 | 1,508.4 | +17.0 | +39 table | |
| 43 | 1,507.2 | +11.6 | +30 table | |
| 44 | 1,505.3 | +1.7 | +13 table | |
| 45 | 1,504.1 | 0.0 | +29 table | |
| 46 | 1,503.9 | +15.3 | +39 table | |
| 47 | 1,502.4 | -10.3 | -10.0 | |
| 48 | 1,501.0 | -1.0 | +15 table | |
| 49 | 1,499.8 | 0.0 | Aligned | |
| 50 | 1,499.3 | 0.0 | +40 table | |
| 51 | 1,498.2 | -12.7 | -12.0 | |
| 52 | 1,493.2 | -9.6 | -7.0 | |
| 53 | 1,491.0 | -14.0 | -11.0 | |
| 54 | 1,483.9 | -9.5 | +13 table | |
| 55 | 1,476.9 | +14.3 | +40 table | |
| 56 | 1,475.8 | +11.6 | +24 table | |
| 57 | 1,473.3 | +9.5 | +31 table | |
| 58 | 1,471.6 | -9.1 | +14 table | |
| 59 | 1,467.0 | -1.7 | +17 table | |
| 60 | 1,462.4 | -7.0 | +24 table | |
| 61 | 1,451.3 | -12.1 | -1.0 | |
| 62 | 1,448.5 | +13.2 | +41 table | |
| 63 | 1,441.3 | 0.0 | +8 table | |
| 64 | 1,424.5 | +12.1 | +58 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
Gimnasia L.P.
Δ5 +17.0 · Table #3
Top faller
Deportivo Camioneros
Δ5 -17.0 · Table #58
Best attack
Boca Juniors
Attack Elo 1,585.6
Best defense
Midland
Defense Elo 1,698.3
Biggest overperformer
Aldosivi
Table #6 vs Power #64
Biggest underperformer
Atletico DE Rafaela
Table #60 vs Power #9
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
The goal here is simple: show visitors which fixtures deserve attention first, which ones carry upset energy, and which ones can move the race lines fastest.
Home lean
Deportivo Moronvs
MidlandKickoff
2026-04-23 02:15
Elo edge
59.1
Expected edge
58.4%
The strongest combined Elo profile in the next set of league fixtures. This is the best place to start if you want one match that matters now.
Home lean
Acassusovs
Gimnasia L.P.Kickoff
2026-04-23 00:00
Elo edge
45.9
Expected edge
56.6%
Power ranking pressure points against the current table order.
Promotion / relegation impact fixtures
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
28
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
33
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Aldosivi
Table #6 vs Power #64
Value gaps
Overperformers
+58 vs power
+41 vs power
+40 vs power
+40 vs power
+39 vs power
Underperformers
+11 value
+8 value
+26 value
+9 value
+29 value
Best value: Independ. Rivadavia (#12 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Estudiantes L.P. (#2 table / #2 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
Top fallers
-17.0
-15.3
-14.3
-14.2
-14.0
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Relegation
Safe zone
No live race cluster.
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
2.72
League scoring profile
Home wins
81.3%
Home edge at league level
Draws
0.0%
Share of level matches
Away wins
18.8%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- Goal volume is balanced rather than extreme, which usually increases match-to-match variance.
- Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
- Draw frequency is relatively low, so decisive results shape the table faster.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
1,584.5
1,584.2
1,583.4
1,581.1
1,571.6
Best away teams
1,561.4
1,558.8
1,549.3
1,548.9
1,543.7
Best attacks
1,585.6
1,567.0
1,560.7
1,549.7
1,548.4
Best defenses
1,698.3
1,690.0
1,687.5
1,657.9
1,655.1
Goal Heatmap
0-15
5
6.1% of league goals
16-30
13
15.9% of league goals
31-45
20
24.4% of league goals
46-60
11
13.4% of league goals
61-75
12
14.6% of league goals
76-90
21
25.6% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
1
25.0% · 8 matches
2
21.9% · 7 matches
3
18.8% · 6 matches
5
12.5% · 4 matches
0
9.4% · 3 matches
4
9.4% · 3 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 1 goals.
Half-time total goals
1
40.6% · 13 matches
0
28.1% · 9 matches
3
15.6% · 5 matches
2
15.6% · 5 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 1 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
1-0
18.8% · 6 matches
2-0
18.8% · 6 matches
0-0
9.4% · 3 matches
4-1
9.4% · 3 matches
2-1
9.4% · 3 matches
3-0
9.4% · 3 matches
0-1
6.3% · 2 matches
2-2
6.3% · 2 matches
Half-time scorelines
1-0
34.4% · 11 matches
0-0
28.1% · 9 matches
3-0
9.4% · 3 matches
2-1
6.3% · 2 matches
0-1
6.3% · 2 matches
1-1
6.3% · 2 matches
2-0
6.3% · 2 matches
0-2
3.1% · 1 matches
Match Stats — Copa Argentina 2026
Goals / match
2.72
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
1.97
Average home goals
Away goals / match
0.47
Average away goals
BTTS
31.3%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
43.8%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
25.0%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
75.0%
Result profile
Draws
18.8%
Result profile
Away wins
6.3%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
56.3%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
12.5%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.16
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
4.00
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.06
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
Gimnasia M.02026-04-15 19:100Gimnasia Y Tiro
Gimnasia L.P.42026-04-10 02:001Deportivo Camioneros
Sarmiento Junin12026-04-09 02:100Tristan Suarez
Velez Sarsfield42026-04-07 23:301Deportivo Armenio
Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto02026-04-07 21:000San Martin Tucuman
Instituto Cordoba22026-04-02 02:150Atlanta
Defensa Y Justicia22026-04-02 00:001Chaco For Ever
Union Santa Fe22026-03-31 02:150Agropecuario
Newells Old Boys02026-03-30 01:151Acassuso
Huracan22026-03-29 23:001Olimpo Bahia Blanca
Momentum leader
Gimnasia L.P.
Δ5 +17.0
Cooling team
Deportivo Camioneros
Δ5 -17.0
Risers & fallers
Top risers
Top fallers
-17.0
-15.3
-14.3
-14.2
-14.0
League Storylines
Current power leader: Independ. Rivadavia (Elo 1,631.3). Momentum leader: Gimnasia L.P. with a last-five Elo change of +17.0. Most dangerous attack rating: Boca Juniors (1,585.6). Most stable defensive rating: Midland (1,698.3). Featured next fixture by combined Elo: Deportivo Moron vs Midland at 2026-04-23 02:15.
Matches 32Goals 87Average Elo 1,532.7
Top team
Independ. Rivadavia
Elo 1,631.3
Bottom team
Aldosivi
Elo 1,424.5
Average Elo
1,532.7
League baseline
Spread
206.8
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in Copa Argentina 2026?
Independ. Rivadavia currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,631.3. The average league Elo is 1,532.7.
vtt 69 , vtd2