League Two — 2026
ChinaPower leader: Shandong Taishan IIHottest: Shanghai Port II +56.5Power spread: 227.6
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
Strongest team
Shandong Taishan II
Elo 1,584.7
Hottest team
Shanghai Port II
Δ5 +56.5
Goals / Match
2.35
League average
League Elo
1,497.2
Spread 227.6
Teams
24
League clubs
Matches
60
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 11 | W W D W W | |
| 2 | 12 | 6 | L W W W W | |
| 3 | 12 | 4 | L W W W W | |
| 4 | 10 | 3 | W W W L D | |
| 5 | 10 | 2 | W D L W W | |
| 6 | 10 | 2 | W L W W D | |
| 7 | 9 | 3 | W D D D W | |
| 8 | 9 | 2 | D W D W D | |
| 9 | 9 | -1 | L W W L W | |
| 10 | 7 | 1 | D W D D D | |
| 11 | 6 | 0 | D D L D W | |
| 12 | 6 | 0 | D D D W L | |
| 13 | 6 | -2 | W D D L D | |
| 14 | 6 | -3 | D D L W D | |
| 15 | 5 | 2 | D L W L D | |
| 16 | 5 | 0 | D D L W L | |
| 17 | 4 | -1 | D D D L D | |
| 18 | 4 | -3 | D L L W L | |
| 19 | 3 | -2 | D L D D L | |
| 20 | 3 | -2 | D D D L L | |
| 21 | 2 | -3 | L D D L L | |
| 22 | 2 | -4 | D L D L L | |
| 23 | 2 | -8 | L L D L D | |
| 24 | 1 | -7 | L L L L D |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,584.7 | +19.9 | -1.0 | |
| 2 | 1,578.8 | +10.7 | -4.0 | |
| 3 | 1,566.2 | -11.4 | -8.0 | |
| 4 | 1,544.8 | -20.6 | -11.0 | |
| 5 | 1,541.2 | +34.4 | +2 table | |
| 6 | 1,533.6 | +56.5 | +5 table | |
| 7 | 1,529.0 | -3.8 | -5.0 | |
| 8 | 1,527.3 | -3.5 | -1.0 | |
| 9 | 1,524.1 | -2.0 | -4.0 | |
| 10 | 1,523.4 | +15.1 | +2 table | |
| 11 | 1,521.8 | -15.6 | -5.0 | |
| 12 | 1,516.5 | +18.2 | +8 table | |
| 13 | 1,508.7 | +18.7 | +6 table | |
| 14 | 1,504.8 | +4.7 | +4 table | |
| 15 | 1,484.4 | +3.1 | +1 table | |
| 16 | 1,465.5 | -13.7 | -4.0 | |
| 17 | 1,465.3 | -13.7 | -1.0 | |
| 18 | 1,462.5 | -45.8 | -5.0 | |
| 19 | 1,454.6 | +32.2 | +14 table | |
| 20 | 1,449.7 | -35.5 | -4.0 | |
| 21 | 1,440.8 | -4.3 | +4 table | |
| 22 | 1,435.5 | -23.5 | +1 table | |
| 23 | 1,411.9 | -20.2 | +1 table | |
| 24 | 1,357.1 | +0.1 | +5 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 11 | W W D W W | |
| 2 | 12 | 6 | L W W W W | |
| 3 | 12 | 4 | L W W W W | |
| 4 | 10 | 3 | W W W L D | |
| 5 | 10 | 2 | W D L W W | |
| 6 | 10 | 2 | W L W W D | |
| 7 | 9 | 3 | W D D D W | |
| 8 | 9 | 2 | D W D W D | |
| 9 | 9 | -1 | L W W L W | |
| 10 | 7 | 1 | D W D D D | |
| 11 | 6 | 0 | D D L D W | |
| 12 | 6 | 0 | D D D W L | |
| 13 | 6 | -2 | W D D L D | |
| 14 | 6 | -3 | D D L W D | |
| 15 | 5 | 2 | D L W L D | |
| 16 | 5 | 0 | D D L W L | |
| 17 | 4 | -1 | D D D L D | |
| 18 | 4 | -3 | D L L W L | |
| 19 | 3 | -2 | D L D D L | |
| 20 | 3 | -2 | D D D L L | |
| 21 | 2 | -3 | L D D L L | |
| 22 | 2 | -4 | D L D L L | |
| 23 | 2 | -8 | L L D L D | |
| 24 | 1 | -7 | L L L L D |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,584.7 | +19.9 | -1.0 | |
| 2 | 1,578.8 | +10.7 | -4.0 | |
| 3 | 1,566.2 | -11.4 | -8.0 | |
| 4 | 1,544.8 | -20.6 | -11.0 | |
| 5 | 1,541.2 | +34.4 | +2 table | |
| 6 | 1,533.6 | +56.5 | +5 table | |
| 7 | 1,529.0 | -3.8 | -5.0 | |
| 8 | 1,527.3 | -3.5 | -1.0 | |
| 9 | 1,524.1 | -2.0 | -4.0 | |
| 10 | 1,523.4 | +15.1 | +2 table | |
| 11 | 1,521.8 | -15.6 | -5.0 | |
| 12 | 1,516.5 | +18.2 | +8 table | |
| 13 | 1,508.7 | +18.7 | +6 table | |
| 14 | 1,504.8 | +4.7 | +4 table | |
| 15 | 1,484.4 | +3.1 | +1 table | |
| 16 | 1,465.5 | -13.7 | -4.0 | |
| 17 | 1,465.3 | -13.7 | -1.0 | |
| 18 | 1,462.5 | -45.8 | -5.0 | |
| 19 | 1,454.6 | +32.2 | +14 table | |
| 20 | 1,449.7 | -35.5 | -4.0 | |
| 21 | 1,440.8 | -4.3 | +4 table | |
| 22 | 1,435.5 | -23.5 | +1 table | |
| 23 | 1,411.9 | -20.2 | +1 table | |
| 24 | 1,357.1 | +0.1 | +5 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
Shanghai Port II
Δ5 +56.5 · Table #1
Top faller
Shanghai Second
Δ5 -45.8 · Table #23
Best attack
Nantong Haimen Codion
Attack Elo 1,604.5
Best defense
Shandong Taishan II
Defense Elo 1,604.4
Biggest overperformer
Hubei Chufeng Heli
Table #5 vs Power #19
Biggest underperformer
Nantong Haimen Codion
Table #15 vs Power #4
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
The goal here is simple: show visitors which fixtures deserve attention first, which ones carry upset energy, and which ones can move the race lines fastest.
Strong home edge
Chengdu Rongcheng IIvs
Langfang Glory CityKickoff
2026-04-29 13:35
Elo edge
104.8
Expected edge
64.6%
The strongest combined Elo profile in the next set of league fixtures. This is the best place to start if you want one match that matters now.
Balanced
Xi'an Ronghaivs
Dalian Yingbo BKickoff
2026-04-29 09:00
Elo edge
15.5
Expected edge
52.2%
Power ranking pressure points against the current table order.
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
9
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
9
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Hubei Chufeng Heli
Table #5 vs Power #19
Value gaps
Overperformers
+14 vs power
+8 vs power
+6 vs power
+5 vs power
+5 vs power
Underperformers
+4 value
+8 value
+11 value
+5 value
+4 value
Best value: Chengdu Rongcheng II (#6 table / #2 Elo)Most fragile top team: Shandong Taishan II (#2 table / #1 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
+56.5
+34.4
+32.2
+19.9
+18.7
Top fallers
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
10 pts
10 pts
9 pts
9 pts
9 pts
7 pts
Relegation
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
5 pts
Safe zone
No live race cluster.
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
2.35
League scoring profile
Home wins
36.7%
Home edge at league level
Draws
40.0%
Share of level matches
Away wins
23.3%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- Goal volume is balanced rather than extreme, which usually increases match-to-match variance.
- Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
- Draw frequency is high, which often means fewer easy separation spots between mid-table teams.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
1,543.6
1,535.6
1,534.1
1,532.7
1,529.1
Best away teams
1,543.6
1,542.1
1,537.5
1,537.4
1,536.4
Best attacks
1,604.5
1,584.2
1,577.3
1,571.4
1,532.2
Best defenses
1,604.4
1,589.5
1,585.7
1,577.6
1,574.6
Goal Heatmap
0-15
23
16.4% of league goals
16-30
21
15.0% of league goals
31-45
21
15.0% of league goals
46-60
17
12.1% of league goals
61-75
28
20.0% of league goals
76-90
30
21.4% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
2
23.3% · 14 matches
1
21.7% · 13 matches
3
16.7% · 10 matches
4
15.0% · 9 matches
0
13.3% · 8 matches
5
5.0% · 3 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 2 goals.
Half-time total goals
0
40.0% · 24 matches
1
31.7% · 19 matches
2
15.0% · 9 matches
3
8.3% · 5 matches
4
3.3% · 2 matches
5
1.7% · 1 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 0 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
1-1
15.0% · 9 matches
0-0
13.3% · 8 matches
1-0
11.7% · 7 matches
2-1
11.7% · 7 matches
0-1
10.0% · 6 matches
2-2
8.3% · 5 matches
2-0
5.0% · 3 matches
3-1
3.3% · 2 matches
Half-time scorelines
0-0
40.0% · 24 matches
1-0
16.7% · 10 matches
0-1
15.0% · 9 matches
1-1
8.3% · 5 matches
2-0
6.7% · 4 matches
2-1
6.7% · 4 matches
2-2
3.3% · 2 matches
0-3
1.7% · 1 matches
Match Stats — League Two 2026
Goals / match
2.35
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
1.23
Average home goals
Away goals / match
1.12
Average away goals
BTTS
51.7%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
41.7%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
25.0%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
36.7%
Result profile
Draws
40.0%
Result profile
Away wins
23.3%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
31.7%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
30.0%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.22
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
3.52
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.17
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
Guizhou Zhucheng12026-04-25 13:300Yichun Grand Tiger
Nantong Haimen Codion22026-04-25 13:302BIT
Shenzhen 202832026-04-25 10:001Guangdong Mingtu
Xiamen Feilu22026-04-25 10:001Wuhan Three Towns II
Jiangxi Liansheng02026-04-25 09:301Hubei Chufeng Heli
Tai'an Tiankuang02026-04-25 09:300Rizhao Yuqi
Xi'an Ronghai02026-04-25 09:003Shanghai Port II
Chengdu Rongcheng II02026-04-24 13:350Shangyu Pterosaur
Langfang Glory City22026-04-24 13:303Guangzhou Dandelion
Shandong Taishan II12026-04-24 13:000Qingdao Red Lions
Momentum leader
Shanghai Port II
Δ5 +56.5
Cooling team
Shanghai Second
Δ5 -45.8
Risers & fallers
Top risers
+56.5
+34.4
+32.2
+19.9
+18.7
Top fallers
League Storylines
Current power leader: Shandong Taishan II (Elo 1,584.7). Momentum leader: Shanghai Port II with a last-five Elo change of +56.5. Most dangerous attack rating: Nantong Haimen Codion (1,604.5). Most stable defensive rating: Shandong Taishan II (1,604.4). Featured next fixture by combined Elo: Chengdu Rongcheng II vs Langfang Glory City at 2026-04-29 13:35.
Matches 60Goals 141Average Elo 1,497.2
Top team
Shandong Taishan II
Elo 1,584.7
Bottom team
Qingdao Red Lions
Elo 1,357.1
Average Elo
1,497.2
League baseline
Spread
227.6
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in League Two 2026?
Shandong Taishan II currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,584.7. The average league Elo is 1,497.2.