Cup — 2026
VietnamPower leader: Công An Nhân DânHottest: Phu Dong +22.7Power spread: 324.9
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
League Elo
1,504.3
Current average rating
Power spread
324.9
Top vs bottom
Strongest team
Công An Nhân Dân
Elo 1,689.3
Hottest team
Phu Dong
Δ5 +22.7
Goals / Match
2.48
League average
League Elo
1,504.3
Spread 324.9
Teams
26
League clubs
Matches
21
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 4 | W W W | |
| 2 | 9 | 3 | W W W | |
| 3 | 6 | 4 | W W | |
| 4 | 6 | 3 | W W L | |
| 5 | 6 | 3 | W W | |
| 6 | 6 | 2 | W W L | |
| 7 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 8 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 9 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 10 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 11 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 13 | 1 | -2 | D L | |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 16 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 17 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 18 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 19 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 20 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 21 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 22 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 23 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 24 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 25 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 26 | 0 | -2 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,689.3 | -3.9 | -14.0 | |
| 2 | 1,646.2 | +22.7 | +1 table | |
| 3 | 1,626.6 | +15.7 | -2.0 | |
| 4 | 1,619.7 | +20.3 | +2 table | |
| 5 | 1,610.6 | +3.4 | +1 table | |
| 6 | 1,606.5 | -9.2 | -13.0 | |
| 7 | 1,541.4 | +7.3 | Aligned | |
| 8 | 1,518.8 | -8.7 | -9.0 | |
| 9 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -14.0 | |
| 10 | 1,499.5 | -12.7 | -12.0 | |
| 11 | 1,491.1 | -12.3 | -5.0 | |
| 12 | 1,489.6 | -9.0 | -8.0 | |
| 13 | 1,487.4 | +2.9 | +1 table | |
| 14 | 1,484.3 | +0.7 | +4 table | |
| 15 | 1,482.8 | 0.0 | +1 table | |
| 16 | 1,477.8 | +22.2 | +13 table | |
| 17 | 1,463.6 | -1.8 | -4.0 | |
| 18 | 1,462.8 | -9.3 | +9 table | |
| 19 | 1,459.9 | +17.8 | +11 table | |
| 20 | 1,456.9 | +13.8 | +14 table | |
| 21 | 1,447.7 | -7.4 | -3.0 | |
| 22 | 1,447.4 | +0.1 | +11 table | |
| 23 | 1,434.9 | -13.6 | -3.0 | |
| 24 | 1,430.3 | -10.0 | +6 table | |
| 25 | 1,372.8 | -10.2 | Aligned | |
| 26 | 1,364.4 | -9.9 | +13 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 4 | W W W | |
| 2 | 9 | 3 | W W W | |
| 3 | 6 | 4 | W W | |
| 4 | 6 | 3 | W W L | |
| 5 | 6 | 3 | W W | |
| 6 | 6 | 2 | W W L | |
| 7 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 8 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 9 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 10 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 11 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 13 | 1 | -2 | D L | |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 16 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 17 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 18 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 19 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 20 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 21 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 22 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 23 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 24 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 25 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 26 | 0 | -2 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,689.3 | -3.9 | -14.0 | |
| 2 | 1,646.2 | +22.7 | +1 table | |
| 3 | 1,626.6 | +15.7 | -2.0 | |
| 4 | 1,619.7 | +20.3 | +2 table | |
| 5 | 1,610.6 | +3.4 | +1 table | |
| 6 | 1,606.5 | -9.2 | -13.0 | |
| 7 | 1,541.4 | +7.3 | Aligned | |
| 8 | 1,518.8 | -8.7 | -9.0 | |
| 9 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -14.0 | |
| 10 | 1,499.5 | -12.7 | -12.0 | |
| 11 | 1,491.1 | -12.3 | -5.0 | |
| 12 | 1,489.6 | -9.0 | -8.0 | |
| 13 | 1,487.4 | +2.9 | +1 table | |
| 14 | 1,484.3 | +0.7 | +4 table | |
| 15 | 1,482.8 | 0.0 | +1 table | |
| 16 | 1,477.8 | +22.2 | +13 table | |
| 17 | 1,463.6 | -1.8 | -4.0 | |
| 18 | 1,462.8 | -9.3 | +9 table | |
| 19 | 1,459.9 | +17.8 | +11 table | |
| 20 | 1,456.9 | +13.8 | +14 table | |
| 21 | 1,447.7 | -7.4 | -3.0 | |
| 22 | 1,447.4 | +0.1 | +11 table | |
| 23 | 1,434.9 | -13.6 | -3.0 | |
| 24 | 1,430.3 | -10.0 | +6 table | |
| 25 | 1,372.8 | -10.2 | Aligned | |
| 26 | 1,364.4 | -9.9 | +13 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
Phu Dong
Δ5 +22.7 · Table #1
Top faller
Thanh Hóa
Δ5 -13.6 · Table #26
Best attack
Công An Nhân Dân
Attack Elo 1,793.0
Best defense
Công An Nhân Dân
Defense Elo 1,653.7
Biggest overperformer
Da Nang
Table #6 vs Power #20
Biggest underperformer
Công An Nhân Dân
Table #15 vs Power #1
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
No upcoming fixtures.
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
9
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
11
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Da Nang
Table #6 vs Power #20
Value gaps
Overperformers
+14 vs power
+13 vs power
+13 vs power
+11 vs power
+11 vs power
Underperformers
Best value: Công An Nhân Dân (#15 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Phu Dong (#1 table / #2 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
Top fallers
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Relegation
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
1 pts
1 pts
Safe zone
No live race cluster.
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
2.48
League scoring profile
Home wins
57.1%
Home edge at league level
Draws
4.8%
Share of level matches
Away wins
38.1%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- Goal volume is balanced rather than extreme, which usually increases match-to-match variance.
- Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
- Draw frequency is relatively low, so decisive results shape the table faster.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
Best away teams
Best attacks
Best defenses
Goal Heatmap
0-15
6
14.0% of league goals
16-30
6
14.0% of league goals
31-45
5
11.6% of league goals
46-60
6
14.0% of league goals
61-75
6
14.0% of league goals
76-90
14
32.6% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
1
28.6% · 6 matches
2
23.8% · 5 matches
3
14.3% · 3 matches
5
9.5% · 2 matches
0
9.5% · 2 matches
4
9.5% · 2 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 1 goals.
Half-time total goals
0
42.9% · 9 matches
2
28.6% · 6 matches
1
23.8% · 5 matches
3
4.8% · 1 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 0 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
1-0
23.8% · 5 matches
2-0
14.3% · 3 matches
1-2
9.5% · 2 matches
0-0
9.5% · 2 matches
3-2
4.8% · 1 matches
2-2
4.8% · 1 matches
3-0
4.8% · 1 matches
2-3
4.8% · 1 matches
Half-time scorelines
0-0
42.9% · 9 matches
1-0
19.0% · 4 matches
1-1
14.3% · 3 matches
0-2
9.5% · 2 matches
2-0
4.8% · 1 matches
1-2
4.8% · 1 matches
0-1
4.8% · 1 matches
Match Stats — Cup 2026
Goals / match
2.48
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
1.38
Average home goals
Away goals / match
0.95
Average away goals
BTTS
38.1%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
38.1%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
23.8%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
52.4%
Result profile
Draws
19.0%
Result profile
Away wins
28.6%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
47.6%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
14.3%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
1.19
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
0.67
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.14
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
Viettel12026-03-21 13:150Bắc Ninh
Phu Dong32026-03-21 12:002Pho Hien
Ho Chi Minh12026-03-20 13:150Bình Phước
Da Nang12026-03-18 12:002Nam Dinh
Pho Hien02026-01-24 12:000Hoang Anh Gia Lai
Công An Nhân Dân22025-11-23 13:152ViettelHo Chi Minh32025-11-23 13:150Ho Chi Minh City
Hai Phong12025-11-23 13:002Phu DongNam Dinh22025-11-23 12:000Long An
Bình Phước22025-11-22 12:000Hồng Lĩnh Hà Tĩnh
Momentum leader
Phu Dong
Δ5 +22.7
Cooling team
Thanh Hóa
Δ5 -13.6
Risers & fallers
Top risers
Top fallers
League Storylines
Current power leader: Công An Nhân Dân (Elo 1,689.3). Momentum leader: Phu Dong with a last-five Elo change of +22.7. Most dangerous attack rating: Công An Nhân Dân (1,793.0). Most stable defensive rating: Công An Nhân Dân (1,653.7).
Matches 21Goals 52Average Elo 1,504.3
Top team
Công An Nhân Dân
Elo 1,689.3
Bottom team
Long An
Elo 1,364.4
Average Elo
1,504.3
League baseline
Spread
324.9
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in Cup 2026?
Công An Nhân Dân currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,689.3. The average league Elo is 1,504.3.