FA Cup — 2025
South-KoreaPower leader: Siheung CitizenHottest: Jeonbuk Motors +34.8Power spread: 255.8
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
League Elo
1,502.0
Current average rating
Power spread
255.8
Top vs bottom
Strongest team
Siheung Citizen
Elo 1,640.9
Hottest team
Jeonbuk Motors
Δ5 +34.8
Goals / Match
3.07
League average
League Elo
1,502.0
Spread 255.8
Teams
58
League clubs
Matches
58
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 6 | W W W D W | |
| 2 | 13 | 6 | W D W W W | |
| 3 | 12 | 4 | W W W L L | |
| 4 | 9 | 12 | W W W L | |
| 5 | 9 | 4 | W W W L | |
| 6 | 7 | 1 | W W D L | |
| 7 | 6 | 4 | W W L | |
| 8 | 6 | 2 | W W L | |
| 9 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 10 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 11 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 12 | 4 | 2 | D W L | |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | W D L | |
| 14 | 4 | 1 | W D | |
| 15 | 4 | 0 | D W L | |
| 16 | 3 | 4 | W L | |
| 17 | 3 | 4 | W L | |
| 18 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 19 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 21 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 22 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 23 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 24 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 25 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 26 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 27 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 28 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 29 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 30 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 31 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 32 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 36 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 37 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 38 | 1 | -2 | D L | |
| 39 | 1 | -4 | D L | |
| 40 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 41 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 42 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 43 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 44 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 45 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 46 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 51 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 52 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 53 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 54 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 55 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 56 | 0 | -5 | L | |
| 57 | 0 | -6 | L | |
| 58 | 0 | -9 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,640.9 | -12.6 | -14.0 | |
| 2 | 1,615.6 | +34.8 | +1 table | |
| 3 | 1,589.1 | -0.6 | -29.0 | |
| 4 | 1,583.0 | -9.8 | -39.0 | |
| 5 | 1,581.2 | +7.3 | -12.0 | |
| 6 | 1,570.5 | +5.1 | -21.0 | |
| 7 | 1,563.7 | +22.3 | +3 table | |
| 8 | 1,563.6 | -9.2 | -32.0 | |
| 9 | 1,562.0 | +1.8 | -25.0 | |
| 10 | 1,552.4 | +21.9 | +5 table | |
| 11 | 1,551.1 | +4.6 | +8 table | |
| 12 | 1,546.1 | -1.1 | -9.0 | |
| 13 | 1,543.7 | +18.4 | +7 table | |
| 14 | 1,537.4 | +4.2 | +4 table | |
| 15 | 1,533.0 | +8.0 | +6 table | |
| 16 | 1,532.2 | -1.2 | -19.0 | |
| 17 | 1,531.6 | -1.4 | -1.0 | |
| 18 | 1,520.3 | -8.9 | -24.0 | |
| 19 | 1,518.9 | -9.0 | -26.0 | |
| 20 | 1,518.3 | +0.3 | Aligned | |
| 21 | 1,509.6 | +9.5 | +9 table | |
| 22 | 1,508.2 | +8.1 | +15 table | |
| 23 | 1,507.8 | +4.7 | Aligned | |
| 24 | 1,507.4 | -0.4 | Aligned | |
| 25 | 1,506.3 | +6.3 | +9 table | |
| 26 | 1,503.4 | +5.4 | +7 table | |
| 27 | 1,503.3 | +0.5 | +1 table | |
| 28 | 1,499.6 | -0.4 | -1.0 | |
| 29 | 1,499.3 | -0.7 | +7 table | |
| 30 | 1,498.3 | -1.7 | -7.0 | |
| 31 | 1,496.3 | -13.0 | -10.0 | |
| 32 | 1,494.6 | +7.7 | +19 table | |
| 33 | 1,490.7 | -9.3 | -15.0 | |
| 34 | 1,490.6 | -2.0 | -2.0 | |
| 35 | 1,489.9 | -10.1 | -4.0 | |
| 36 | 1,487.2 | -12.8 | -8.0 | |
| 37 | 1,485.4 | -14.6 | -12.0 | |
| 38 | 1,483.6 | -16.4 | -14.0 | |
| 39 | 1,483.2 | -7.8 | -8.0 | |
| 40 | 1,482.5 | -17.5 | -14.0 | |
| 41 | 1,482.5 | -17.5 | -14.0 | |
| 42 | 1,481.4 | -18.6 | -14.0 | |
| 43 | 1,481.4 | -18.6 | -15.0 | |
| 44 | 1,481.2 | -11.0 | -6.0 | |
| 45 | 1,480.9 | -19.1 | -12.0 | |
| 46 | 1,478.3 | -12.4 | +8 table | |
| 47 | 1,476.5 | +13.0 | +33 table | |
| 48 | 1,469.2 | +28.0 | +46 table | |
| 49 | 1,457.5 | +10.2 | +38 table | |
| 50 | 1,451.5 | +16.3 | +42 table | |
| 51 | 1,450.7 | +9.7 | +23 table | |
| 52 | 1,425.9 | +4.0 | +27 table | |
| 53 | 1,421.3 | -11.1 | Aligned | |
| 54 | 1,416.2 | +3.9 | +24 table | |
| 55 | 1,406.6 | -15.9 | +4 table | |
| 56 | 1,402.4 | +2.2 | +23 table | |
| 57 | 1,386.4 | +2.7 | +26 table | |
| 58 | 1,385.1 | -7.9 | +12 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 6 | W W W D W | |
| 2 | 13 | 6 | W D W W W | |
| 3 | 12 | 4 | W W W L L | |
| 4 | 9 | 12 | W W W L | |
| 5 | 9 | 4 | W W W L | |
| 6 | 7 | 1 | W W D L | |
| 7 | 6 | 4 | W W L | |
| 8 | 6 | 2 | W W L | |
| 9 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 10 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 11 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 12 | 4 | 2 | D W L | |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | W D L | |
| 14 | 4 | 1 | W D | |
| 15 | 4 | 0 | D W L | |
| 16 | 3 | 4 | W L | |
| 17 | 3 | 4 | W L | |
| 18 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 19 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 21 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 22 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 23 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 24 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 25 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 26 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 27 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 28 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 29 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 30 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 31 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 32 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 36 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 37 | 1 | 0 | D | |
| 38 | 1 | -2 | D L | |
| 39 | 1 | -4 | D L | |
| 40 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 41 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 42 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 43 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 44 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 45 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 46 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 51 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 52 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 53 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 54 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 55 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 56 | 0 | -5 | L | |
| 57 | 0 | -6 | L | |
| 58 | 0 | -9 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,640.9 | -12.6 | -14.0 | |
| 2 | 1,615.6 | +34.8 | +1 table | |
| 3 | 1,589.1 | -0.6 | -29.0 | |
| 4 | 1,583.0 | -9.8 | -39.0 | |
| 5 | 1,581.2 | +7.3 | -12.0 | |
| 6 | 1,570.5 | +5.1 | -21.0 | |
| 7 | 1,563.7 | +22.3 | +3 table | |
| 8 | 1,563.6 | -9.2 | -32.0 | |
| 9 | 1,562.0 | +1.8 | -25.0 | |
| 10 | 1,552.4 | +21.9 | +5 table | |
| 11 | 1,551.1 | +4.6 | +8 table | |
| 12 | 1,546.1 | -1.1 | -9.0 | |
| 13 | 1,543.7 | +18.4 | +7 table | |
| 14 | 1,537.4 | +4.2 | +4 table | |
| 15 | 1,533.0 | +8.0 | +6 table | |
| 16 | 1,532.2 | -1.2 | -19.0 | |
| 17 | 1,531.6 | -1.4 | -1.0 | |
| 18 | 1,520.3 | -8.9 | -24.0 | |
| 19 | 1,518.9 | -9.0 | -26.0 | |
| 20 | 1,518.3 | +0.3 | Aligned | |
| 21 | 1,509.6 | +9.5 | +9 table | |
| 22 | 1,508.2 | +8.1 | +15 table | |
| 23 | 1,507.8 | +4.7 | Aligned | |
| 24 | 1,507.4 | -0.4 | Aligned | |
| 25 | 1,506.3 | +6.3 | +9 table | |
| 26 | 1,503.4 | +5.4 | +7 table | |
| 27 | 1,503.3 | +0.5 | +1 table | |
| 28 | 1,499.6 | -0.4 | -1.0 | |
| 29 | 1,499.3 | -0.7 | +7 table | |
| 30 | 1,498.3 | -1.7 | -7.0 | |
| 31 | 1,496.3 | -13.0 | -10.0 | |
| 32 | 1,494.6 | +7.7 | +19 table | |
| 33 | 1,490.7 | -9.3 | -15.0 | |
| 34 | 1,490.6 | -2.0 | -2.0 | |
| 35 | 1,489.9 | -10.1 | -4.0 | |
| 36 | 1,487.2 | -12.8 | -8.0 | |
| 37 | 1,485.4 | -14.6 | -12.0 | |
| 38 | 1,483.6 | -16.4 | -14.0 | |
| 39 | 1,483.2 | -7.8 | -8.0 | |
| 40 | 1,482.5 | -17.5 | -14.0 | |
| 41 | 1,482.5 | -17.5 | -14.0 | |
| 42 | 1,481.4 | -18.6 | -14.0 | |
| 43 | 1,481.4 | -18.6 | -15.0 | |
| 44 | 1,481.2 | -11.0 | -6.0 | |
| 45 | 1,480.9 | -19.1 | -12.0 | |
| 46 | 1,478.3 | -12.4 | +8 table | |
| 47 | 1,476.5 | +13.0 | +33 table | |
| 48 | 1,469.2 | +28.0 | +46 table | |
| 49 | 1,457.5 | +10.2 | +38 table | |
| 50 | 1,451.5 | +16.3 | +42 table | |
| 51 | 1,450.7 | +9.7 | +23 table | |
| 52 | 1,425.9 | +4.0 | +27 table | |
| 53 | 1,421.3 | -11.1 | Aligned | |
| 54 | 1,416.2 | +3.9 | +24 table | |
| 55 | 1,406.6 | -15.9 | +4 table | |
| 56 | 1,402.4 | +2.2 | +23 table | |
| 57 | 1,386.4 | +2.7 | +26 table | |
| 58 | 1,385.1 | -7.9 | +12 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
Jeonbuk Motors
Δ5 +34.8 · Table #1
Top faller
Jeonju Original
Δ5 -19.1 · Table #57
Best attack
Daejeon Korail
Attack Elo 1,628.8
Best defense
Seongnam FC
Defense Elo 1,631.1
Biggest overperformer
Gwangju FC
Table #2 vs Power #48
Biggest underperformer
Seoul E-Land FC
Table #43 vs Power #4
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
No upcoming fixtures.
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
24
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
26
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Gwangju FC
Table #2 vs Power #48
Value gaps
Overperformers
+46 vs power
+42 vs power
+38 vs power
+33 vs power
+27 vs power
Underperformers
+14 value
+29 value
+39 value
+12 value
+21 value
Best value: Siheung Citizen (#15 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Jeonbuk Motors (#1 table / #2 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
Top fallers
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
9 pts
7 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
4 pts
4 pts
4 pts
4 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Relegation
4 pts
4 pts
4 pts
4 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Safe zone
No live race cluster.
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
3.07
League scoring profile
Home wins
48.3%
Home edge at league level
Draws
12.1%
Share of level matches
Away wins
39.7%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- This looks like a high-event league: goals per match are comfortably above the typical 2.5 line.
- Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
- Draw frequency is relatively low, so decisive results shape the table faster.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
1,550.8
1,532.5
1,532.4
1,529.9
1,524.3
Best away teams
1,593.2
1,577.4
1,562.0
1,555.1
1,553.4
Best attacks
Best defenses
1,631.1
1,629.2
1,605.8
1,592.7
1,589.0
Goal Heatmap
0-15
13
13.1% of league goals
16-30
13
13.1% of league goals
31-45
9
9.1% of league goals
46-60
22
22.2% of league goals
61-75
18
18.2% of league goals
76-90
24
24.2% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
3
39.7% · 23 matches
1
15.5% · 9 matches
2
13.8% · 8 matches
4
13.8% · 8 matches
6
8.6% · 5 matches
5
5.2% · 3 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 3 goals.
Half-time total goals
1
39.2% · 20 matches
0
37.3% · 19 matches
2
17.6% · 9 matches
3
5.9% · 3 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 1 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
1-2
17.2% · 10 matches
1-0
12.1% · 7 matches
2-1
10.3% · 6 matches
3-0
8.6% · 5 matches
2-0
6.9% · 4 matches
1-1
6.9% · 4 matches
3-1
6.9% · 4 matches
0-1
3.4% · 2 matches
Half-time scorelines
0-0
37.3% · 19 matches
0-1
21.6% · 11 matches
1-0
17.6% · 9 matches
1-1
7.8% · 4 matches
2-0
5.9% · 3 matches
0-2
3.9% · 2 matches
2-1
2.0% · 1 matches
3-0
2.0% · 1 matches
Match Stats — FA Cup 2025
Goals / match
3.07
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
1.52
Average home goals
Away goals / match
1.59
Average away goals
BTTS
55.2%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
69.0%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
29.3%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
48.3%
Result profile
Draws
12.1%
Result profile
Away wins
39.7%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
29.3%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
19.0%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.52
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
1.12
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.12
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
Gwangju FC12025-12-06 05:302Jeonbuk Motors
Bucheon FC 199512025-08-27 12:302Gwangju FC
Gangwon FC12025-08-27 12:302Jeonbuk MotorsGwangju FC22025-08-20 12:300Bucheon FC 1995Jeonbuk Motors12025-08-20 12:001Gangwon FC
FC Seoul02025-07-02 12:301Jeonbuk Motors
Daegu FC12025-07-02 12:002Gangwon FC
Gimpo Citizen12025-07-02 12:003Bucheon FC 1995Gwangju FC12025-07-02 12:000Ulsan Hyundai FC
Bucheon FC 199532025-05-14 12:301Gimcheon Sangmu FC
Momentum leader
Jeonbuk Motors
Δ5 +34.8
Cooling team
Jeonju Original
Δ5 -19.1
Risers & fallers
Top risers
Top fallers
League Storylines
Current power leader: Siheung Citizen (Elo 1,640.9). Momentum leader: Jeonbuk Motors with a last-five Elo change of +34.8. Most dangerous attack rating: Daejeon Korail (1,628.8). Most stable defensive rating: Seongnam FC (1,631.1).
Matches 58Goals 178Average Elo 1,502.0
Top team
Siheung Citizen
Elo 1,640.9
Bottom team
Cheongju
Elo 1,385.1
Average Elo
1,502.0
League baseline
Spread
255.8
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in FA Cup 2025?
Siheung Citizen currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,640.9. The average league Elo is 1,502.0.