Cup — 2025
UkrainePower leader: Shakhtar DonetskHottest: Dynamo Kyiv +42.0Power spread: 460.0
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
League Elo
1,504.8
Current average rating
Power spread
460.0
Top vs bottom
Strongest team
Shakhtar Donetsk
Elo 1,742.5
Hottest team
Dynamo Kyiv
Δ5 +42.0
Goals / Match
2.94
League average
League Elo
1,504.8
Spread 460.0
Teams
60
League clubs
Matches
48
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 8 | W W W W L | |
| 2 | 12 | 7 | W W W W | |
| 3 | 12 | 4 | W W W W | |
| 4 | 12 | 3 | W W W W L | |
| 5 | 6 | 6 | W W | |
| 6 | 6 | 5 | W W | |
| 7 | 6 | 5 | W W | |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | W W | |
| 9 | 6 | 4 | W W | |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | W W | |
| 11 | 6 | 2 | W W | |
| 12 | 6 | 2 | W W | |
| 13 | 6 | 2 | W W | |
| 14 | 6 | 2 | W W | |
| 15 | 3 | 7 | W L | |
| 16 | 3 | 7 | W | |
| 17 | 3 | 3 | W L | |
| 18 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 19 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 22 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 23 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 24 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 25 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 26 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 27 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 28 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 29 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 30 | 3 | -6 | W L | |
| 31 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 32 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 33 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 34 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 35 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 36 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 37 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 38 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 39 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 40 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 41 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 42 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 43 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 44 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 45 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 46 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 51 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 52 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 53 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 54 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 55 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 56 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 57 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 58 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 59 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 60 | 0 | -8 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,742.5 | -2.0 | -20.0 | |
| 2 | 1,679.4 | +42.0 | Aligned | |
| 3 | 1,656.5 | +3.8 | -1.0 | |
| 4 | 1,656.4 | +30.4 | -6.0 | |
| 5 | 1,632.5 | +37.0 | +4 table | |
| 6 | 1,628.9 | -15.1 | -48.0 | |
| 7 | 1,617.3 | -17.5 | -45.0 | |
| 8 | 1,609.9 | -1.6 | -3.0 | |
| 9 | 1,597.0 | +9.6 | -13.0 | |
| 10 | 1,577.3 | +1.3 | -22.0 | |
| 11 | 1,565.3 | 0.0 | -23.0 | |
| 12 | 1,562.7 | -15.9 | -46.0 | |
| 13 | 1,562.3 | -6.6 | -3.0 | |
| 14 | 1,559.4 | -11.9 | -12.0 | |
| 15 | 1,556.6 | +0.5 | -32.0 | |
| 16 | 1,554.6 | +21.3 | -2.0 | |
| 17 | 1,534.7 | +6.2 | +2 table | |
| 18 | 1,534.1 | -10.3 | -23.0 | |
| 19 | 1,528.5 | +20.7 | +12 table | |
| 20 | 1,522.8 | -3.4 | -26.0 | |
| 21 | 1,522.6 | -9.2 | -19.0 | |
| 22 | 1,522.2 | +5.0 | +19 table | |
| 23 | 1,513.7 | 0.0 | -33.0 | |
| 24 | 1,500.3 | 0.0 | -9.0 | |
| 25 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -17.0 | |
| 26 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -31.0 | |
| 27 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -8.0 | |
| 28 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -8.0 | |
| 29 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -30.0 | |
| 30 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -23.0 | |
| 31 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -13.0 | |
| 32 | 1,499.8 | +15.2 | +24 table | |
| 33 | 1,496.2 | -3.8 | +21 table | |
| 34 | 1,492.3 | -7.0 | +17 table | |
| 35 | 1,491.9 | -8.1 | +16 table | |
| 36 | 1,490.1 | +8.7 | +22 table | |
| 37 | 1,487.7 | -13.8 | -1.0 | |
| 38 | 1,487.6 | -12.9 | -7.0 | |
| 39 | 1,487.2 | -12.8 | +10 table | |
| 40 | 1,486.1 | -13.9 | +13 table | |
| 41 | 1,486.0 | -14.0 | +18 table | |
| 42 | 1,484.5 | -15.5 | -7.0 | |
| 43 | 1,480.9 | +29.8 | +37 table | |
| 44 | 1,480.2 | +21.4 | +31 table | |
| 45 | 1,469.5 | +2.8 | +6 table | |
| 46 | 1,463.1 | +14.6 | +15 table | |
| 47 | 1,455.6 | +2.3 | +23 table | |
| 48 | 1,450.3 | +13.8 | +43 table | |
| 49 | 1,448.7 | -9.3 | -1.0 | |
| 50 | 1,431.2 | +8.8 | +41 table | |
| 51 | 1,430.3 | -8.3 | +14 table | |
| 52 | 1,426.9 | -7.8 | +24 table | |
| 53 | 1,420.2 | -8.1 | +5 table | |
| 54 | 1,416.9 | 0.0 | +11 table | |
| 55 | 1,379.6 | -9.7 | +35 table | |
| 56 | 1,375.0 | -0.3 | +31 table | |
| 57 | 1,372.4 | -15.9 | -3.0 | |
| 58 | 1,341.8 | -14.0 | +28 table | |
| 59 | 1,335.3 | -14.0 | +8 table | |
| 60 | 1,282.5 | -12.5 | +5 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 8 | W W W W L | |
| 2 | 12 | 7 | W W W W | |
| 3 | 12 | 4 | W W W W | |
| 4 | 12 | 3 | W W W W L | |
| 5 | 6 | 6 | W W | |
| 6 | 6 | 5 | W W | |
| 7 | 6 | 5 | W W | |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | W W | |
| 9 | 6 | 4 | W W | |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | W W | |
| 11 | 6 | 2 | W W | |
| 12 | 6 | 2 | W W | |
| 13 | 6 | 2 | W W | |
| 14 | 6 | 2 | W W | |
| 15 | 3 | 7 | W L | |
| 16 | 3 | 7 | W | |
| 17 | 3 | 3 | W L | |
| 18 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 19 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 22 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 23 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 24 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 25 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 26 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 27 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 28 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 29 | 3 | -2 | W L | |
| 30 | 3 | -6 | W L | |
| 31 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 32 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 33 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 34 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 35 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 36 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 37 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 38 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 39 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 40 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 41 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 42 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 43 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 44 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 45 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 46 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 51 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 52 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 53 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 54 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 55 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 56 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 57 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 58 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 59 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 60 | 0 | -8 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,742.5 | -2.0 | -20.0 | |
| 2 | 1,679.4 | +42.0 | Aligned | |
| 3 | 1,656.5 | +3.8 | -1.0 | |
| 4 | 1,656.4 | +30.4 | -6.0 | |
| 5 | 1,632.5 | +37.0 | +4 table | |
| 6 | 1,628.9 | -15.1 | -48.0 | |
| 7 | 1,617.3 | -17.5 | -45.0 | |
| 8 | 1,609.9 | -1.6 | -3.0 | |
| 9 | 1,597.0 | +9.6 | -13.0 | |
| 10 | 1,577.3 | +1.3 | -22.0 | |
| 11 | 1,565.3 | 0.0 | -23.0 | |
| 12 | 1,562.7 | -15.9 | -46.0 | |
| 13 | 1,562.3 | -6.6 | -3.0 | |
| 14 | 1,559.4 | -11.9 | -12.0 | |
| 15 | 1,556.6 | +0.5 | -32.0 | |
| 16 | 1,554.6 | +21.3 | -2.0 | |
| 17 | 1,534.7 | +6.2 | +2 table | |
| 18 | 1,534.1 | -10.3 | -23.0 | |
| 19 | 1,528.5 | +20.7 | +12 table | |
| 20 | 1,522.8 | -3.4 | -26.0 | |
| 21 | 1,522.6 | -9.2 | -19.0 | |
| 22 | 1,522.2 | +5.0 | +19 table | |
| 23 | 1,513.7 | 0.0 | -33.0 | |
| 24 | 1,500.3 | 0.0 | -9.0 | |
| 25 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -17.0 | |
| 26 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -31.0 | |
| 27 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -8.0 | |
| 28 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -8.0 | |
| 29 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -30.0 | |
| 30 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -23.0 | |
| 31 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -13.0 | |
| 32 | 1,499.8 | +15.2 | +24 table | |
| 33 | 1,496.2 | -3.8 | +21 table | |
| 34 | 1,492.3 | -7.0 | +17 table | |
| 35 | 1,491.9 | -8.1 | +16 table | |
| 36 | 1,490.1 | +8.7 | +22 table | |
| 37 | 1,487.7 | -13.8 | -1.0 | |
| 38 | 1,487.6 | -12.9 | -7.0 | |
| 39 | 1,487.2 | -12.8 | +10 table | |
| 40 | 1,486.1 | -13.9 | +13 table | |
| 41 | 1,486.0 | -14.0 | +18 table | |
| 42 | 1,484.5 | -15.5 | -7.0 | |
| 43 | 1,480.9 | +29.8 | +37 table | |
| 44 | 1,480.2 | +21.4 | +31 table | |
| 45 | 1,469.5 | +2.8 | +6 table | |
| 46 | 1,463.1 | +14.6 | +15 table | |
| 47 | 1,455.6 | +2.3 | +23 table | |
| 48 | 1,450.3 | +13.8 | +43 table | |
| 49 | 1,448.7 | -9.3 | -1.0 | |
| 50 | 1,431.2 | +8.8 | +41 table | |
| 51 | 1,430.3 | -8.3 | +14 table | |
| 52 | 1,426.9 | -7.8 | +24 table | |
| 53 | 1,420.2 | -8.1 | +5 table | |
| 54 | 1,416.9 | 0.0 | +11 table | |
| 55 | 1,379.6 | -9.7 | +35 table | |
| 56 | 1,375.0 | -0.3 | +31 table | |
| 57 | 1,372.4 | -15.9 | -3.0 | |
| 58 | 1,341.8 | -14.0 | +28 table | |
| 59 | 1,335.3 | -14.0 | +8 table | |
| 60 | 1,282.5 | -12.5 | +5 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
Dynamo Kyiv
Δ5 +42.0 · Table #2
Top faller
Kulykiv
Δ5 -17.5 · Table #52
Best attack
Shakhtar Donetsk
Attack Elo 1,847.7
Best defense
Shakhtar Donetsk
Defense Elo 1,735.0
Biggest overperformer
Nyva Ternopil
Table #5 vs Power #48
Biggest underperformer
Polessya
Table #54 vs Power #6
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
No upcoming fixtures.
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
28
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
28
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Polessya
Table #54 vs Power #6
Value gaps
Overperformers
+43 vs power
+41 vs power
+37 vs power
+35 vs power
+31 vs power
Underperformers
+20 value
+6 value
+48 value
+45 value
+3 value
Best value: Shakhtar Donetsk (#21 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Dynamo Kyiv (#2 table / #2 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
Top fallers
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Relegation
Safe zone
No live race cluster.
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
2.94
League scoring profile
Home wins
52.1%
Home edge at league level
Draws
0.0%
Share of level matches
Away wins
56.3%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- Goal volume is balanced rather than extreme, which usually increases match-to-match variance.
- Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
- Draw frequency is relatively low, so decisive results shape the table faster.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
1,606.9
1,593.7
1,560.8
1,560.8
1,560.0
Best away teams
Best attacks
Best defenses
1,735.0
1,693.0
1,689.4
1,680.8
1,669.7
Goal Heatmap
0-15
11
8.4% of league goals
16-30
20
15.3% of league goals
31-45
14
10.7% of league goals
46-60
28
21.4% of league goals
61-75
21
16.0% of league goals
76-90
37
28.2% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
3
28.9% · 13 matches
1
22.2% · 10 matches
2
20.0% · 9 matches
0
11.1% · 5 matches
4
6.7% · 3 matches
7
4.4% · 2 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 3 goals.
Half-time total goals
1
44.4% · 20 matches
0
35.6% · 16 matches
2
13.3% · 6 matches
3
6.7% · 3 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 1 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
0-0
11.1% · 5 matches
1-1
11.1% · 5 matches
1-0
11.1% · 5 matches
0-1
11.1% · 5 matches
0-3
8.9% · 4 matches
3-0
6.7% · 3 matches
2-1
6.7% · 3 matches
1-2
6.7% · 3 matches
Half-time scorelines
0-0
35.6% · 16 matches
1-0
22.2% · 10 matches
0-1
22.2% · 10 matches
0-2
8.9% · 4 matches
3-0
4.4% · 2 matches
2-0
2.2% · 1 matches
1-1
2.2% · 1 matches
0-3
2.2% · 1 matches
Match Stats — Cup 2025
Goals / match
2.94
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
1.13
Average home goals
Away goals / match
1.33
Average away goals
BTTS
35.6%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
46.7%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
17.8%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
35.6%
Result profile
Draws
24.4%
Result profile
Away wins
40.0%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
31.1%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
42.2%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.67
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
1.22
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.16
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
Metalist 1925 Kharkiv02026-04-22 17:000Chernihiv
Bukovyna02026-04-21 17:003Dynamo Kyiv
Chernihiv02026-03-18 10:000Yarud Mariupol'
Metalist 1925 Kharkiv32026-03-05 12:000Lokomotiv Kyiv
LNZ Cherkasy02026-03-04 14:300BukovynaDynamo Kyiv22026-03-03 17:000Inhulets
Metalist 1925 Kharkiv42025-10-30 16:003Ahrobiznes Volochysk
Tyshkivka12025-10-30 11:001Yarud Mariupol'Dynamo Kyiv22025-10-29 17:001Shakhtar Donetsk
LNZ Cherkasy12025-10-29 13:300Ruh Lviv
Momentum leader
Dynamo Kyiv
Δ5 +42.0
Cooling team
Kulykiv
Δ5 -17.5
Risers & fallers
Top risers
Top fallers
League Storylines
Current power leader: Shakhtar Donetsk (Elo 1,742.5). Momentum leader: Dynamo Kyiv with a last-five Elo change of +42.0. Most dangerous attack rating: Shakhtar Donetsk (1,847.7). Most stable defensive rating: Shakhtar Donetsk (1,735.0).
Matches 48Goals 141Average Elo 1,504.8
Top team
Shakhtar Donetsk
Elo 1,742.5
Bottom team
Real Pharm
Elo 1,282.5
Average Elo
1,504.8
League baseline
Spread
460.0
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in Cup 2025?
Shakhtar Donetsk currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,742.5. The average league Elo is 1,504.8.