US Open Cup — 2026
USAPower leader: San Jose EarthquakesHottest: Sacramento Republic +25.9Power spread: 217.5
In one page, understand the league, identify the strongest teams, spot value gaps between the table and real strength, and know which fixtures matter next.
Strongest team
San Jose Earthquakes
Elo 1,604.0
Hottest team
Sacramento Republic
Δ5 +25.9
Goals / Match
3.24
League average
League Elo
1,509.8
Spread 217.5
Teams
80
League clubs
Matches
63
Counted fixtures
Standings vs FootyWow Power
Read the official table and FootyWow Power Rankings together. The table shows what teams have earned; Power shows what their current strength profile suggests next.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 7 | W W W | |
| 2 | 9 | 5 | W W W | |
| 3 | 9 | 4 | W W W | |
| 4 | 6 | 8 | W W L | |
| 5 | 6 | 5 | W W L | |
| 6 | 6 | 5 | W W L | |
| 7 | 6 | 5 | W W L | |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | W W L | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | W W L | |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | W W L | |
| 11 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 12 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 13 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 14 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 15 | 6 | -1 | W W L | |
| 16 | 6 | -2 | W W L | |
| 17 | 3 | 7 | W L | |
| 18 | 3 | 6 | W | |
| 19 | 3 | 5 | W L | |
| 20 | 3 | 4 | W | |
| 21 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 22 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 23 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 24 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 25 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 26 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 27 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 28 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 29 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 30 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 31 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 32 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 33 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 34 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 35 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 36 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 37 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 38 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 39 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 40 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 41 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 42 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 43 | 3 | -3 | W L | |
| 44 | 3 | -3 | W L | |
| 45 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 46 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 51 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 52 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 53 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 54 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 55 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 56 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 57 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 58 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 59 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 60 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 61 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 62 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 63 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 64 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 65 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 66 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 67 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 68 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 69 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 70 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 71 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 72 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 73 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 74 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 75 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 76 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 77 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 78 | 0 | -6 | L | |
| 79 | 0 | -8 | L | |
| 80 | 0 | -9 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,604.0 | +7.8 | -27.0 | |
| 2 | 1,603.8 | 0.0 | Aligned | |
| 3 | 1,583.5 | -18.0 | -62.0 | |
| 4 | 1,582.7 | +3.7 | -11.0 | |
| 5 | 1,573.3 | -11.9 | -56.0 | |
| 6 | 1,572.1 | 0.0 | -56.0 | |
| 7 | 1,568.3 | 0.0 | -14.0 | |
| 8 | 1,564.8 | 0.0 | -34.0 | |
| 9 | 1,563.8 | -15.4 | -44.0 | |
| 10 | 1,561.5 | +2.4 | -24.0 | |
| 11 | 1,558.3 | -13.4 | -47.0 | |
| 12 | 1,557.3 | -13.7 | -59.0 | |
| 13 | 1,557.0 | +25.9 | +6 table | |
| 14 | 1,556.2 | 0.0 | -22.0 | |
| 15 | 1,555.4 | 0.0 | -15.0 | |
| 16 | 1,549.6 | 0.0 | +13 table | |
| 17 | 1,548.2 | 0.0 | -12.0 | |
| 18 | 1,545.4 | 0.0 | +7 table | |
| 19 | 1,541.9 | +7.4 | +15 table | |
| 20 | 1,541.2 | 0.0 | -18.0 | |
| 21 | 1,533.1 | +16.4 | -16.0 | |
| 22 | 1,532.9 | +13.7 | -2.0 | |
| 23 | 1,526.2 | 0.0 | -34.0 | |
| 24 | 1,525.5 | 0.0 | +6 table | |
| 25 | 1,523.0 | -2.5 | Aligned | |
| 26 | 1,520.6 | +3.7 | +7 table | |
| 27 | 1,519.4 | 0.0 | -5.0 | |
| 28 | 1,518.4 | 0.0 | +20 table | |
| 29 | 1,517.4 | -9.6 | -18.0 | |
| 30 | 1,517.0 | +14.0 | +8 table | |
| 31 | 1,516.8 | +19.9 | +21 table | |
| 32 | 1,516.0 | 0.0 | +1 table | |
| 33 | 1,515.6 | 0.0 | -21.0 | |
| 34 | 1,515.4 | 0.0 | -41.0 | |
| 35 | 1,513.8 | +21.8 | +26 table | |
| 36 | 1,513.6 | 0.0 | +23 table | |
| 37 | 1,511.7 | +11.2 | +4 table | |
| 38 | 1,511.7 | 0.0 | -14.0 | |
| 39 | 1,510.2 | 0.0 | +34 table | |
| 40 | 1,509.7 | 0.0 | -23.0 | |
| 41 | 1,509.3 | +9.3 | +1 table | |
| 42 | 1,507.3 | -8.2 | -1.0 | |
| 43 | 1,504.2 | +19.1 | +42 table | |
| 44 | 1,500.8 | +0.8 | -25.0 | |
| 45 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -31.0 | |
| 46 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | |
| 47 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | |
| 48 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -25.0 | |
| 49 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -19.0 | |
| 50 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -17.0 | |
| 51 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | +10 table | |
| 52 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -8.0 | |
| 53 | 1,499.1 | 0.0 | +36 table | |
| 54 | 1,498.3 | 0.0 | -26.0 | |
| 55 | 1,495.4 | -4.6 | +11 table | |
| 56 | 1,492.8 | -9.3 | Aligned | |
| 57 | 1,489.4 | 0.0 | +43 table | |
| 58 | 1,488.3 | -11.7 | -12.0 | |
| 59 | 1,487.7 | 0.0 | Aligned | |
| 60 | 1,487.6 | 0.0 | -6.0 | |
| 61 | 1,486.1 | -13.9 | -16.0 | |
| 62 | 1,486.0 | -14.0 | -16.0 | |
| 63 | 1,481.4 | -18.6 | -16.0 | |
| 64 | 1,480.8 | 0.0 | +38 table | |
| 65 | 1,474.7 | -11.3 | -7.0 | |
| 66 | 1,474.2 | 0.0 | +43 table | |
| 67 | 1,472.6 | 0.0 | +28 table | |
| 68 | 1,470.5 | 0.0 | +62 table | |
| 69 | 1,468.9 | -0.8 | +24 table | |
| 70 | 1,467.3 | 0.0 | +54 table | |
| 71 | 1,461.7 | 0.0 | +7 table | |
| 72 | 1,457.5 | 0.0 | +23 table | |
| 73 | 1,450.8 | 0.0 | +27 table | |
| 74 | 1,450.4 | 0.0 | +47 table | |
| 75 | 1,447.3 | +20.0 | +55 table | |
| 76 | 1,446.1 | 0.0 | +64 table | |
| 77 | 1,439.6 | -11.8 | +22 table | |
| 78 | 1,438.1 | 0.0 | +30 table | |
| 79 | 1,427.3 | 0.0 | +44 table | |
| 80 | 1,386.5 | -8.4 | +6 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
Official standings
| # | Team | Pts | GD | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 7 | W W W | |
| 2 | 9 | 5 | W W W | |
| 3 | 9 | 4 | W W W | |
| 4 | 6 | 8 | W W L | |
| 5 | 6 | 5 | W W L | |
| 6 | 6 | 5 | W W L | |
| 7 | 6 | 5 | W W L | |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | W W L | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | W W L | |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | W W L | |
| 11 | 6 | 1 | W W L | |
| 12 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 13 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 14 | 6 | 0 | W W L | |
| 15 | 6 | -1 | W W L | |
| 16 | 6 | -2 | W W L | |
| 17 | 3 | 7 | W L | |
| 18 | 3 | 6 | W | |
| 19 | 3 | 5 | W L | |
| 20 | 3 | 4 | W | |
| 21 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 22 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 23 | 3 | 3 | W | |
| 24 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 25 | 3 | 2 | W L | |
| 26 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 27 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 28 | 3 | 2 | W | |
| 29 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 30 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 31 | 3 | 1 | W L | |
| 32 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 33 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 34 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 35 | 3 | 1 | W | |
| 36 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 37 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 38 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 39 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 40 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 41 | 3 | 0 | W L | |
| 42 | 3 | -1 | W L | |
| 43 | 3 | -3 | W L | |
| 44 | 3 | -3 | W L | |
| 45 | 0 | 0 | – | |
| 46 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 47 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 48 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 49 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 50 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 51 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 52 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 53 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 54 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 55 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 56 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 57 | 0 | -1 | L | |
| 58 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 59 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 60 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 61 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 62 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 63 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 64 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 65 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 66 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 67 | 0 | -2 | L | |
| 68 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 69 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 70 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 71 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 72 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 73 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 74 | 0 | -3 | L | |
| 75 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 76 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 77 | 0 | -4 | L | |
| 78 | 0 | -6 | L | |
| 79 | 0 | -8 | L | |
| 80 | 0 | -9 | L |
Compact by design so visitors can read the full standing table quickly without wide sideways scrolling.
FootyWow power rankings
| # | Team | Elo | Δ5 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,604.0 | +7.8 | -27.0 | |
| 2 | 1,603.8 | 0.0 | Aligned | |
| 3 | 1,583.5 | -18.0 | -62.0 | |
| 4 | 1,582.7 | +3.7 | -11.0 | |
| 5 | 1,573.3 | -11.9 | -56.0 | |
| 6 | 1,572.1 | 0.0 | -56.0 | |
| 7 | 1,568.3 | 0.0 | -14.0 | |
| 8 | 1,564.8 | 0.0 | -34.0 | |
| 9 | 1,563.8 | -15.4 | -44.0 | |
| 10 | 1,561.5 | +2.4 | -24.0 | |
| 11 | 1,558.3 | -13.4 | -47.0 | |
| 12 | 1,557.3 | -13.7 | -59.0 | |
| 13 | 1,557.0 | +25.9 | +6 table | |
| 14 | 1,556.2 | 0.0 | -22.0 | |
| 15 | 1,555.4 | 0.0 | -15.0 | |
| 16 | 1,549.6 | 0.0 | +13 table | |
| 17 | 1,548.2 | 0.0 | -12.0 | |
| 18 | 1,545.4 | 0.0 | +7 table | |
| 19 | 1,541.9 | +7.4 | +15 table | |
| 20 | 1,541.2 | 0.0 | -18.0 | |
| 21 | 1,533.1 | +16.4 | -16.0 | |
| 22 | 1,532.9 | +13.7 | -2.0 | |
| 23 | 1,526.2 | 0.0 | -34.0 | |
| 24 | 1,525.5 | 0.0 | +6 table | |
| 25 | 1,523.0 | -2.5 | Aligned | |
| 26 | 1,520.6 | +3.7 | +7 table | |
| 27 | 1,519.4 | 0.0 | -5.0 | |
| 28 | 1,518.4 | 0.0 | +20 table | |
| 29 | 1,517.4 | -9.6 | -18.0 | |
| 30 | 1,517.0 | +14.0 | +8 table | |
| 31 | 1,516.8 | +19.9 | +21 table | |
| 32 | 1,516.0 | 0.0 | +1 table | |
| 33 | 1,515.6 | 0.0 | -21.0 | |
| 34 | 1,515.4 | 0.0 | -41.0 | |
| 35 | 1,513.8 | +21.8 | +26 table | |
| 36 | 1,513.6 | 0.0 | +23 table | |
| 37 | 1,511.7 | +11.2 | +4 table | |
| 38 | 1,511.7 | 0.0 | -14.0 | |
| 39 | 1,510.2 | 0.0 | +34 table | |
| 40 | 1,509.7 | 0.0 | -23.0 | |
| 41 | 1,509.3 | +9.3 | +1 table | |
| 42 | 1,507.3 | -8.2 | -1.0 | |
| 43 | 1,504.2 | +19.1 | +42 table | |
| 44 | 1,500.8 | +0.8 | -25.0 | |
| 45 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -31.0 | |
| 46 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | |
| 47 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | |
| 48 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -25.0 | |
| 49 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -19.0 | |
| 50 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -17.0 | |
| 51 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | +10 table | |
| 52 | 1,500.0 | 0.0 | -8.0 | |
| 53 | 1,499.1 | 0.0 | +36 table | |
| 54 | 1,498.3 | 0.0 | -26.0 | |
| 55 | 1,495.4 | -4.6 | +11 table | |
| 56 | 1,492.8 | -9.3 | Aligned | |
| 57 | 1,489.4 | 0.0 | +43 table | |
| 58 | 1,488.3 | -11.7 | -12.0 | |
| 59 | 1,487.7 | 0.0 | Aligned | |
| 60 | 1,487.6 | 0.0 | -6.0 | |
| 61 | 1,486.1 | -13.9 | -16.0 | |
| 62 | 1,486.0 | -14.0 | -16.0 | |
| 63 | 1,481.4 | -18.6 | -16.0 | |
| 64 | 1,480.8 | 0.0 | +38 table | |
| 65 | 1,474.7 | -11.3 | -7.0 | |
| 66 | 1,474.2 | 0.0 | +43 table | |
| 67 | 1,472.6 | 0.0 | +28 table | |
| 68 | 1,470.5 | 0.0 | +62 table | |
| 69 | 1,468.9 | -0.8 | +24 table | |
| 70 | 1,467.3 | 0.0 | +54 table | |
| 71 | 1,461.7 | 0.0 | +7 table | |
| 72 | 1,457.5 | 0.0 | +23 table | |
| 73 | 1,450.8 | 0.0 | +27 table | |
| 74 | 1,450.4 | 0.0 | +47 table | |
| 75 | 1,447.3 | +20.0 | +55 table | |
| 76 | 1,446.1 | 0.0 | +64 table | |
| 77 | 1,439.6 | -11.8 | +22 table | |
| 78 | 1,438.1 | 0.0 | +30 table | |
| 79 | 1,427.3 | 0.0 | +44 table | |
| 80 | 1,386.5 | -8.4 | +6 table |
Negative gap means the team may be stronger than its current table position. Positive gap means it may be running above its current strength signal.
League Pulse
Top riser
Sacramento Republic
Δ5 +25.9 · Table #7
Top faller
BOHFS St. Louis
Δ5 -18.6 · Table #79
Best attack
Virginia Dream
Attack Elo 1,833.8
Best defense
Sacramento Republic
Defense Elo 1,658.0
Biggest overperformer
Westchester SC
Table #12 vs Power #76
Biggest underperformer
Laredo Heat
Table #65 vs Power #3
Upcoming Fixtures That Matter
The goal here is simple: show visitors which fixtures deserve attention first, which ones carry upset energy, and which ones can move the race lines fastest.
Strong home edge
San Jose Earthquakesvs
Minnesota United FCKickoff
2026-04-29 04:00
Elo edge
97.5
Expected edge
63.7%
The strongest combined Elo profile in the next set of league fixtures. This is the best place to start if you want one match that matters now.
Away lean
Columbus Crewvs
One KnoxvilleKickoff
2026-04-30 01:30
Elo edge
20.4
Expected edge
47.1%
Small Elo gap despite visible table separation.
Table vs Power Insights
Overperformers
34
Teams whose table place currently runs ahead of FootyWow Power
Underperformers
39
Teams whose current strength looks better than their table place
Largest gap
Westchester SC
Table #12 vs Power #76
Value gaps
Overperformers
+64 vs power
+62 vs power
+55 vs power
+54 vs power
+47 vs power
Underperformers
+27 value
+62 value
+11 value
+56 value
+56 value
Best value: San Jose Earthquakes (#28 table / #1 Elo)Most fragile top team: Louisville City (#2 table / #2 Elo)
Momentum by team
Top risers
+25.9
+21.8
+20.0
+19.9
+19.1
Top fallers
Race Tracker
Title
Playoffs / upper push
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
6 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Relegation
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
3 pts
Safe zone
No live race cluster.
League Character & Splits
Goals / match
3.24
League scoring profile
Home wins
60.3%
Home edge at league level
Draws
0.0%
Share of level matches
Away wins
39.7%
Away resilience
Over / Under Goals Trend
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | ||
| 1.5 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 3.5 | ||
| 4.5 |
Stability / chaos notes
- This looks like a high-event league: goals per match are comfortably above the typical 2.5 line.
- Power spread is wide, so hierarchy is clearer and top-vs-bottom gaps matter more.
- Draw frequency is relatively low, so decisive results shape the table faster.
Home-away strength and power splits
Best home teams
Best away teams
1,548.2
1,536.8
1,535.6
1,531.7
1,531.3
Best attacks
1,833.8
1,684.7
1,666.7
1,652.9
1,649.7
Best defenses
1,658.0
1,588.4
1,585.5
1,571.3
1,570.8
Goal Heatmap
0-15
23
12.0% of league goals
16-30
28
14.7% of league goals
31-45
34
17.8% of league goals
46-60
23
12.0% of league goals
61-75
35
18.3% of league goals
76-90
48
25.1% of league goals
Hottest scoring window: 76-90. This heatmap is built from the league-wide minute splits already stored in the cached team statistics.
Frequent Total Goals
Full-time total goals
2
23.8% · 15 matches
0
23.8% · 15 matches
1
22.2% · 14 matches
3
15.9% · 10 matches
4
6.3% · 4 matches
5
3.2% · 2 matches
Most common FT goal environment: 2 goals.
Half-time total goals
2
30.6% · 19 matches
1
30.6% · 19 matches
0
30.6% · 19 matches
3
6.5% · 4 matches
4
1.6% · 1 matches
Most common HT goal environment: 2 goals.
Frequent Scorelines
Full-time scorelines
0-0
23.8% · 15 matches
1-0
12.7% · 8 matches
2-0
11.1% · 7 matches
1-1
9.5% · 6 matches
0-1
9.5% · 6 matches
3-0
7.9% · 5 matches
1-2
6.3% · 4 matches
4-0
3.2% · 2 matches
Half-time scorelines
0-0
30.6% · 19 matches
1-0
19.4% · 12 matches
2-0
17.7% · 11 matches
0-1
11.3% · 7 matches
1-1
9.7% · 6 matches
0-3
3.2% · 2 matches
0-2
3.2% · 2 matches
3-0
1.6% · 1 matches
Match Stats — US Open Cup 2026
Goals / match
3.24
League-wide scoring baseline
Home goals / match
1.14
Average home goals
Away goals / match
0.76
Average away goals
BTTS
22.2%
Matches where both teams scored
Over 2.5
30.2%
Share of 3+ goal games
Over 3.5
14.3%
Share of 4+ goal games
Home wins
41.3%
Result profile
Draws
33.3%
Result profile
Away wins
25.4%
Result profile
Home clean sheets
39.7%
Home teams shutting out opponents
Away clean sheets
20.6%
Away teams shutting out opponents
Penalties / match
0.35
Scored or missed penalties
Yellow cards / match
2.43
League discipline load
Red cards / match
0.33
Dismissals across the league
These league match stats are served from the existing cached season data, so the section stays fast and does not add heavy client-side work.
Recent Fixtures & Momentum
Recent results
San Jose Earthquakes22026-04-16 04:000Phoenix Rising
Houston Dynamo42026-04-16 02:001El Paso Locomotive
St. Louis City42026-04-16 02:000FC Tulsa
Charlotte02026-04-16 01:300Charlotte Independence
Chattanooga12026-04-16 01:301Atlanta United FC
DC United02026-04-16 01:300One Knoxville
New York Red Bulls02026-04-16 01:300Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Richmond Kickers02026-04-16 01:300Columbus Crew
Naples02026-04-16 01:001Orlando City SC
Sacramento Republic02026-04-15 04:000Minnesota United FCMomentum leader
Sacramento Republic
Δ5 +25.9
Cooling team
BOHFS St. Louis
Δ5 -18.6
Risers & fallers
Top risers
+25.9
+21.8
+20.0
+19.9
+19.1
Top fallers
League Storylines
Current power leader: San Jose Earthquakes (Elo 1,604.0). Momentum leader: Sacramento Republic with a last-five Elo change of +25.9. Most dangerous attack rating: Virginia Dream (1,833.8). Most stable defensive rating: Sacramento Republic (1,658.0). Featured next fixture by combined Elo: San Jose Earthquakes vs Minnesota United FC at 2026-04-29 04:00.
Matches 63Goals 204Average Elo 1,509.8
Top team
San Jose Earthquakes
Elo 1,604.0
Bottom team
Sporting Kansas City
Elo 1,386.5
Average Elo
1,509.8
League baseline
Spread
217.5
Top vs bottom
FAQ & Methodology
What are FootyWow Power Rankings on this page?
They are precomputed Elo-based league rankings that sit next to the official table. They estimate current team strength using results, home edge, goal margin, and attack/defense micro-updates.
Why can the Power Rankings differ from the table?
The table rewards accumulated points, while FootyWow Power reacts to the quality and strength signal behind those results. That helps surface overperformers, underperformers, and momentum swings.
Who is the current power leader in US Open Cup 2026?
San Jose Earthquakes currently leads the league by Elo with an overall rating of 1,604.0. The average league Elo is 1,509.8.